The Research on Multi-Level Theses Evaluation Model Based on Fuzzy Cluster Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

The traditional process of thesis evaluation is of subjectivity and differences of teachers’ qualifications and backgrounds. Considering these characteristics, this paper proposes a multi-level theses evaluation model based on fuzzy cluster analysis with the idea of fuzzy mathematics. In this model, it evaluates the teachers’ qualification first to determine the weight of various teachers’ evaluation to the thesis; then stratifies theses evaluation indicators, and according to the results of various indicators, it builds a fuzzy equivalent matrix, and ultimately selects the appropriate similarity coefficient to divide the theses into excellent, good, moderate, bad four grades. This model greatly improves the scientificalness and objectivity of the traditional theses evaluation process and provides a reference for the process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1083-1089

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Dunn J C. A graph theoretic analysis of classification via Tamura's fuzzy relation. IEEE Trans. SMC, 1974, 4(3): 310-313.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.1974.5409141

Google Scholar

[2] Zkim Le, Fuzzy relation compositions and pattern recognition. Inf. Sci. 1996, 89: 107-130.

Google Scholar

[3] Zadeh L A. Similarity relation and fuzzy orderings. Inf. Sci. 1971, 3: 177-200.

Google Scholar

[4] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans. onControl System Magazine, 1988. 83-93.

Google Scholar

[5] Tamra S, et al. Pattern classification based on fuzzy relation. IEEE Trans. SMC, 1971, 1(1): 217-242.

Google Scholar

[6] Backer E, Jain A K. A clustering performance measure based on fuzzy set decomposition. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 1981, 3(1): 66-74.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1981.4767051

Google Scholar

[7] Gao Xinbo. Fuzzy Cluster Analysis and Its Applications Xidian University Press 2004. 42-46.

Google Scholar

[8] Maulik U. Bandyopadhyay S. & Saha, I. Integrating clustering and supervised learning for categorical data nalysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Manand Cybernetics Part-A. 2009, doi: 10. 1109/TSMCA. 2010. 2041225.

DOI: 10.1109/tsmca.2010.2041225

Google Scholar

[9] Maulik, U. & Bandyopadhyay, S. Performance evaluation of some clustering algorithms and validity indices, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2002, 24(12): 1650–1654.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2002.1114856

Google Scholar

[10] Kim, S. Y., Lee, J. W., & Bae, J. S. Effect of data normalization on fuzzy clustering of DNA microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics, 2006, 7(134).

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-134

Google Scholar

[11] Jiao L C, et al. Genetic algorithm-based approach to crisp c-partition. ACTA ELECTRONICA SINICA, 1996, 5(1):76-82.

Google Scholar

[12] Kim, M., & Ramakrishna, R. New indices for cluster validity assessment. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2005, 26(15): 2353–2363.

DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.04.007

Google Scholar

[13] Gao xinbo, Ji hongbing, Li Jie. An advanced cluster analysis method based on statistical test. Proceeding of IEEE Internatioanl Conference on Signal Processing, Beijing, China, 2002. 994-997.

DOI: 10.1109/icosp.2002.1179981

Google Scholar