Indicator Species Analysis of Forest Communities along a Disturbance Gradient in Guangzhou, China

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to reveal the effect of disturbance on species composition and detect indicator species for disturbance gradients, we conducted an investigation of urban forest communities along a disturbance gradient in Guangzhou, China. Species richness in the tree layer and understory had no significant difference among disturbance gradients, but Simpson index, Shannon-Weiner index and Evenness index varied significantly.species diversity index decreased with disturbance gradient. Multi-Response Permutation Procedures (MRPP) revealed high significance in species composition of both tree and understory layer among different disturbance gradients. Twelve species from the tree layer and 25 from the understory were detected to characterize the forest communities with a certain disturbance regime by Indicator Species Analysis (ISA). Indicator species help enhance our understanding of species-environment relationship, and the ecological response of indicator species to disturbance can be used for monitoring forest environmental change.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1275-1282

Citation:

Online since:

August 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Mao Zhihong, Zhu Jiaojun. 2006. Effects of disturbances on species composition and diversity of plant communities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(8): 2695-2701.

Google Scholar

[2] Mishra B P, Tripathi O P, Tripathi R S, et al. 2004. Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, northeast India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 421-436.

DOI: 10.1023/b:bioc.0000006509.31571.a0

Google Scholar

[3] Dale VH, Beyeler SC, Jackson B. 2002. Understory vegetation indicators of anthropogenic disturbance in longleaf pine forests at Fort Benning, Georgia, USA. Ecological Indicators, 1:155-170.

DOI: 10.1016/s1470-160x(01)00014-0

Google Scholar

[4] Diekmann M. 2003. Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology-a review. Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 493-506.

DOI: 10.1078/1439-1791-00185

Google Scholar

[5] De Wit T. 1983. Lichens as indicators for air quality. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 3:273-282.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00396221

Google Scholar

[6] Oosterveld P. 1983. Taraxacum species as environment indicators for grassland management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 3: 381-389.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00396233

Google Scholar

[7] Liu Chenfeng, Yin Jing, He Kangning. 2004. Indicatory function of soilmoisture of undergrowth vegetations in the Robinia pseudoacacia forests with different densities in emiarid region on the Loess Plateaus. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2 (2): 62 - 79.

Google Scholar

[8] Mallik A U, Lamb E G, Rasid H.Vegetation zonation among the microhabitats in a lacustrine environment: analysis and application of belowground species trait patterns.Ecological Engineering, 2001, 18(2): 135-146.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8574(01)00069-6

Google Scholar

[9] Stallins J A. 2002. Dune plant species diversity and function in two barrier island biogeomorphic systems. Plant Ecology, 165: 183-196.

Google Scholar

[10] McCune B, Mefford M J. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 5. 0.Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA: MjM Software Design.

Google Scholar

[11] Ou Yuduan, Wang Huanan, Zhang Lu, et al. 2009a. Topographic correlates of understory plant species distribution in Nanling National Nature Reserve, Guangdong. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 27(1): 41-46.

Google Scholar

[12] Ou Zhiyang, Su Zhiyao, Ye Yongchang, et al. 2009b. Ground vegetation as indicators of topsoil chemical properties in Dongguan, South China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(2): 984-992.

Google Scholar

[13] Moora M, Daniell T, Kalle H, et al. 2007. Spatial pattern and species richness of boreonemoral forest understorey and its determinants-a comparison of differently managed forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 250, 64-70.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.010

Google Scholar

[14] BAO Weikai, CHEN Qingheng, LIU Zhaoguang. 2000. Changes of Structure and Species Composition of Degraded Plant Community along Disturbance Gradients of Different Intensities. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 22 (3) : 307-316.

Google Scholar

[15] Denslow J S. 1995. Disturbance and diversity in tropical rain forests: the density effect. Ecological Applications, 5, 962-968.

DOI: 10.2307/2269347

Google Scholar

[16] Connell J H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forest and coral reefs. Science, 199: 1302-1310.

DOI: 10.1126/science.199.4335.1302

Google Scholar

[17] Phillips O L, Hall P, Gentry AH, et al. 1997. Species richness, tropical forest dynamics and sampling: Response to Sheil Oikos, 79: 183-190.

DOI: 10.2307/3546105

Google Scholar

[18] Fei Yanrui. 1986. Applcation of indicator species in forestation. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology, 1986, 2:38-41.

Google Scholar

[19] Lü Haorong, Liu Songsong, Zhu Jianyun, et al. 2009. Effects of human disturbance on understory woody species composition and diversity in fengshui forests. Biodiversity Science, 17 (5): 458–467.

DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1003.2009.09174

Google Scholar

[20] Jacobson S, Gustafsson L. 2001. Effects on ground vegetation of the application of wood ash to a Swedish Scots pine stand. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2 (3) : 233 – 241.

DOI: 10.1078/1439-1791-00050

Google Scholar

[21] Chazdon RL, Fetcher N. 1984. Photosynthetic light environments in a lowland of tropical rainforest in Costa Rica. Jounral of Ecology, 72:553-564.

DOI: 10.2307/2260066

Google Scholar

[22] Bianduo Baji, Guo Quanshui, Ci Bai, et al. 2004. Effects of gap in primitive subalpine fir forest on diversity of herb and shrub in Tibet. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 15(2): 191-194.

Google Scholar