Dosimetry and Temperature Evaluation of TEM Chamber for Cell Exposure at 1800 MHz

Article Preview

Abstract:

Using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method, we make a dosimetry study on the specific absorption rate (SAR) in cells exposed to 1800 MHz standing waves produced by the transverse electromagnetic (TEM) chamber. Two types of cultured cells are used, namely, the cell layer and the cell suspension. Based on the calculated SAR distribution, the exposure is characterized by the SAR intensity and homogeneity. We consider different exposure arrangements as the combination of the maximum fields of the standing wave and the polarizations of the Petri dish. The maximum E field and maximum H field are used in turn in the exposure volume, where the Petri dish is polarized in the E, H, k and k directions, respectively. The best exposure arrangements are determined by measuring the intensity and homogeneity of the SAR distribution in cells. For a tight control of the thermal environment, the temperature rise in the cell culture induced by the exposure is calculated by using the finite-difference formulation of the bio-heat conduction equation. The linear relation between the maximum temperature rise and the absorbed power is determined to quantify the exposure power for the temperature control.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

879-884

Citation:

Online since:

August 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ICNIRP, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz), Health Physics, vol. 74, pp.494-522.

DOI: 10.1097/hp.0b013e3181aff9db

Google Scholar

[2] F. Schönborn, K. Poković, M. Burkhardt, and N. Kuster, Basis for optimization of in vitro exposure apparatus for health hazard evaluations of mobile communications, Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 22, pp.547-559.

DOI: 10.1002/bem.83

Google Scholar

[3] G. Prisco, G. d'Ambrosio, N. Calabrese, R. Massa, and J. Juutilainen, SAR and efficiency evaluation of a 900 MHz waveguide chamber for cell exposure, Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 29, pp.429-438.

DOI: 10.1002/bem.20405

Google Scholar

[4] J. Schuderer and N. Kuster, Effect of the meniscus at the solid/liquid interface on the SAR distribution in Petri dishes and flasks, Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 24, pp.103-108.

DOI: 10.1002/bem.10066

Google Scholar

[5] J. Schuderer, T. Samaras, W. Oesch, D. Spat, and N. Kuster, High peak SAR exposure unit with tight exposure and environmental control for in vitro experiments at 1800 MHz, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 52, p.2057-(2066).

DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2004.832009

Google Scholar

[6] J. Schuderer, D. Spät, T. Samaras, W. Oesch, and N. Kuster, In vitro exposure systems for RF exposures at 900 MHz, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 52, p.2067-(2075).

DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2004.832010

Google Scholar

[7] P. Bernardi, M. Cavagnaro, S. Pisa, and E. Piuzzi, SAR distribution and temperature increase in an anatomical model of the human eye exposed to the field radiated by the user antenna in a wireless LAN, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 46, p.2074-(2082).

DOI: 10.1109/22.739285

Google Scholar