Comparison between New Concrete Filled Steel Tube Frame Structure and Steel Frame Structure

Ying Wang; Miao Li; Jin Hua Xu; Zhe Zhang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.204-208.1024

Paper Titles

The Vibration of the Raft-Superstructure on the Saturated Soil under Moving Load by Using a Semi-Analysis Method
p.1003

Establishment of an Oxidation Ditch Model Based on Flow Pattern and ASM1
p.1007

Vertical Deflection of Simply Supported Box Beam with Corrugated Steel Webs Including Effects of Shear Lag and Shear Deformation
p.1012

Impact Performance Analysis and Optimization of X-Sandwich Panels
p.1017

Comparison between New Concrete Filled Steel Tube Frame Structure and Steel Frame Structure
p.1024

Study on Seismic Performance of Infilled Frame of Underlying Weak Layer
p.1028

Study on Common Problem and the Design of Granary Railway Canopy
p.1034

Arrangement Principle of Hoop-Layers of Imitating Bamboo Drum Type Tridimensional Parking Structure
p.1040

Nonlinear Buckling Behaviour of Imperfect Cylindrical Shells under Global Bending in the Elastic-Plastic Range
p.1045

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 204-208Comparison between New Concrete Filled Steel Tube...

Comparison between New Concrete Filled Steel Tube Frame Structure and Steel Frame Structure

Abstract:

Concrete filled steel tube (CFT) structure has advantages of the high tensile strength and ductility of steel in addition to the high compressive strength and stiffness of concrete. This research proposes a new CFT column-CFT beam frame structure. In order to validate the cost performance of the new CFT column-CFT beam frame structure, designs were carried out for building frames using both the new CFT column-CFT beam frame structure and conventional steel frame structure. The amount of consumed materials and cost estimations of each designed new CFT and conventional steel building frame are analyzed and compared. The result shows that the new CFT column-CFT beam frame structure is able to exhibit high cost performance than conventional steel frame structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Progress in Industrial and Civil Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 204-208)

Pages:

1024-1027

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.204-208.1024

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2012

Authors:

Ying Wang, Miao Li, Jin Hua Xu, Zhe Zhang

Keywords:

CFT Structure, Cost Performance, Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC), Story Drift Angle

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] S. Morino, M. Uchikoshi and I. Yamaguchi: Concrete-filled Steel Tube Column System-Its Advantages. Steel Structure. Vol. 1(2001), p.33.

Google Scholar

[2] H. Okamura, K. Ozawa and M. Ouchi: Self-compacting concrete. Structural Concrete. Vol. 1(2001), p.3.

Google Scholar

[3] Specification for Structural Steel Design (Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo 1986).

Google Scholar

[4] Recommendations for Design and Construction of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Structures (Association of New Urban Housing Technology, Tokyo 2002).

Google Scholar