Seismic Response Analysis of Long Span Cable-Stayed Bridge by Response Spectrum Method

Min Chao Jin; Bao Fu Wang; Zhong Ren Feng; Xiong Jiang Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.204-208.1992

Paper Titles

Stay Cable Tubes Positioning Control of Prestressed Concrete Low-Pylon Cable-Stayed Bridge
p.1971

Sensitivity Analysis on Dynamic Properties of Large Span Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Arch Bridge
p.1976

Long-Term Performance of Bridge Elements Using Integrated Deterioration Method Incorporating Elman Neural Network
p.1980

Modification of the Conventional Method for the Track-Bridge Interaction
p.1988

Seismic Response Analysis of Long Span Cable-Stayed Bridge by Response Spectrum Method
p.1992

Fuzzy Reliability Evaluation of RC Rigid-Frame Arch Bridge in Service
p.1999

A Comprehensive Method of Determining Cable Force during Closure Condition for CFST Arch Bridge
p.2004

The Instability Analysis and Processing Scheme of ChangXin Viaduct Abutment
p.2009

Anti-Collision Device Structure Research on Reservoir Arch Bridge
p.2014

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 204-208Seismic Response Analysis of Long Span...

Seismic Response Analysis of Long Span Cable-Stayed Bridge by Response Spectrum Method

Abstract:

Based on response spectrum method, the seismic behavior of a long span cable-stayed bridge is investigated through three dimensional finite element model established by ANSYS. By calculating the cumulative effective mass factors of the bridge, the minimum number of modes used for modal superposition analysis is obtained. Design acceleration response spectrums under two probabilities are used in the analysis. The response spectrums are input in the bridge longitudinal direction, vertical direction, transverse direction and combined horizontal and vertical directions. Displacements and internal forces results show that vertical component of the ground motion greatly influences the response of the bridge and there is significant difference between the results of the two probabilities.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Progress in Industrial and Civil Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 204-208)

Pages:

1992-1996

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.204-208.1992

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2012

Authors:

Min Chao Jin, Bao Fu Wang, Zhong Ren Feng, Xiong Jiang Wang

Keywords:

Cable-Stayed Bridge, Cumulative Effective Mass Factors, Dynamic Characteristic, Response Spectrum Method, Seismic Response

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Newmark, N. M. and Rosenblueth, E., Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall, NJ, (1971).

Google Scholar

[2] R. G. Joshi, I. D. Gupta. On the relative performance of spectrum superposition methods considering modal interaction effects [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1998 , 17: 357–369.

DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(98)00024-4

Google Scholar

[3] X.W. Wang, A.J. Ye. Computational mode number research in seismic response spectrum Analysis of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge[J]. Structural Engineers, 2011, 27(4): 84–90.

Google Scholar

[4] Merchant, H. C. and Golden, T. C. Investigation of bounds for the maximum response of earthquake excited systems. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 1974, 64, 1239–1249.

Google Scholar

[5] Clough, R. W. Earthquake analysis by response spectrum superposition. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 1962, 52(3), 647–680.

Google Scholar

[6] Wilson, E. L., Der Kiureghian, A. and Bayo, E. A replacement for the SRSS method in seismic analysis. Earthq. Engng Struct. Dyn., 1981, 9, 187–192.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290090207

Google Scholar

[7] Gupta, A. K. and Cordero, K., Combination of modal responses, Trans. of 6th Int. Conf. on SMiRT, Paper No. K7/15, (1981).

Google Scholar

[8] Der Kiureghian, A. and Nakamura, Y. CQC modal combination rule for high-frequency modes. Earthq. Engng Struct. Dyn., 1993, 22, 943–956.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290221103

Google Scholar