The Relationship between Mechanical Properties and Shrinkage of the Concretes Used in Florida

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper investigated the mechanical strength and shrinkage properties of the concrete mixtures frequently used in Florida. The concrete mixtures were proportioned with three different types of coarse aggregates, such as Miami Oolite limestone, Georgia granite and Stalite lightweight aggregate, and two mineral additives, including fly ash and slag. And fourteen concrete mixtures were evaluated on their characteristics of compressive strength, elastic modulus and shrinkage for 91 days. The empirical relationship between the mechanical properties of concretes and shrinkage strain was analyzed mathematically. The results indicate that the compressive strength and elastic modulus of concrete are exponentially related the shrinkage strain of concrete. The finding from this study is agreeable with that by Troxell et al [5]. Also, the effectiveness of ACI 209 and CEB-FIP models on predicting the shrinkage behavior of concretes used frequently in Florida was evaluated. The result indicates that CEB-FIP model gives more reliable prediction than ACI 209 model does.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3799-3804

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Pichett, G., 1956. Effect of aggregate on shrinkage of concrete and hypothesis concerning shrinkage. J. Amer. Concr. Inst., 52, pp.581-590.

DOI: 10.14359/11617

Google Scholar

[2] Hermite, R. L', 1960. Volume changes of concrete. Proc. 4th Int. Symp. On the Chemistry of cement, Washington DC, pp.659-694.

Google Scholar

[3] Leming, M. L., 1990. Comparison of mechanical properties of high strength concrete made with different raw mateials. Transportation Research Record, 1990, No. 1284, pp.23-30.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Zia, M. L. Leming, S. H. Ahmad, J. J. Schemmel, R. P. Elliott, and A. E. Naaman., 1993a. Mechanical Behavior of High Performance Concretes, Volume 1~5: Summary Report. Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., xi, 98 pp. (SHRP-C-361).

Google Scholar

[5] Troxell, G.E., Raphael, J.M. and Davis, R.E., 1958. Long-time creep and shrinkage tests of plain and reinforced concrete. Proc. ASTM., 58, pp.1101-1120.

Google Scholar

[6] Reichard, T.W., 1964. Creep and drying shrinkage of lightweight and normal weight concretes. Nat. Bur. Stand. Monograph, 74, Washington DC, March, (1964).

DOI: 10.6028/nbs.mono.74

Google Scholar

[7] Collins, T. M., 1989. Proportioning High-Strength Concrete to Control Creep and Shrinkage. ACI Materials Journal, Nov-Dec, Vol. 86, No. 6, pp.576-580.

DOI: 10.14359/2211

Google Scholar

[8] Bisschop, J. and Van Mier, J.G.M., 2000. Effect of Aggregates on Drying Shrinkage Microcracking in Cement-based Materials. UEF conference, Mt-Tremblant, Canada, August, 2000, (Con. Sc. Techn).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02483132

Google Scholar

[9] Ozyildirim, C. 2000. Evaluation of High-Performance Concrete Pavement in Newport News, A. Draft Interim Report, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville.

Google Scholar

[10] Aitcin, P-C. and Mehta, P. K. 1990. Effect of coarse aggregate characteristics on mechanical properties of high strength concrete. ACI Materials Journal, Mar-Apr 1990, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp.103-107.

DOI: 10.14359/1882

Google Scholar