A New ERR and Strategy for Bi-Directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

The efficiency of the element removal or addition is of significance for evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) process. The key is to find an appropriate rejection criterion (RC) which allows to assess the contribution of each element to the specified behavior(stress, stiffness, displacement, etc.)of the structure, and to subsequently remove elements with least contribution. This paper proposed a varying elements removal ratio (VERR) method which uses a larger ERR (Element Rejection Ratio) value at early iterations where exist a lot of redundant material, and decreases the value of ERR in the optimal process to lessen the number of elements removed at later iterations. Meanwhile, this paper proposed a strategy for element addition based on stress level and the contribution of elements to the structure in order to decide which elements should be added to the model and the sequence of the element addition. With the proposed VERR and the strategy, the optimization procedure of the structure evolves more quickly and smoothly.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4422-4428

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Xie Y M, Steven G P: A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization[J]. Computers & Structures, 1993, 49: 885-886.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-c

Google Scholar

[2] Y.M. Xie, G.P. Steven: Optimal design of multiple load case structures using an evolutionary procedure[J], Eng. Comput. 11 (1994) 295–302.

DOI: 10.1108/02644409410799290

Google Scholar

[3] Yang XY, Xie, YM, Steven, GP, Querin, OM: Bidirectional evolutionary method for stiffness optimization. AIAA Journal 37 (11) (1999): 1483–1488.

DOI: 10.2514/2.626

Google Scholar

[4] O.M. Querin, V. Young, G.P. Steven et al: Computational efficiency and validation of bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization [J]. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 189 (2000) 559-573.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00309-6

Google Scholar

[5] Huang X, Xie YM: Convergent and mesh-independent solutions for the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method [J]. Finite Elem Anal Des, doi: 10. 1016/j. finel. 2007. 06. 006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2007.06.006

Google Scholar

[6] O.M. Querin, G.P. Steven Y.M. Xie: Evolutionary structural optimization using an additive algorithm, Finite Element Anal. Des. 34 (2000) 291–308.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-874x(99)00044-x

Google Scholar

[7] D.N. Chu. Y.M. Xie, A. Hire and G.P. Steven: An evolutionary procedure for structural optimization with displacement constraints. Building for 21st century. Proc. 5th East Asia-Pacific Conference on the Structural Engineering and Construction, (1995).

Google Scholar

[8] D.N. Chu. Y.M. Xie, A. Hire and G.P. Steven: Evolutionary structural optimization for problem with stiffness constraint [J]. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. (1996) 21 pp.239-251.

DOI: 10.1016/0168-874x(95)00043-s

Google Scholar

[9] D. Nha Chu, Y.M. Xie, A. Hira et al : On various aspects of evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraints[J]. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 24 (1997), p.197~212.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-874x(96)00049-2

Google Scholar