Metadata Caching Subsystem for Cloud Storage

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cloud storage is a hot topic in current research. Different from previous work, we emphasize the importance of metadata cache in the study of cloud storage. Because the efficiency of distributed file system has much effect on cloud storage The metadata operation accounts for more than 50% of the total file operation. So the strategy of efficient metadata management is important. There are three parts in this paper. We start with a brief introduction of cloud storage. Then a metadata caching algorithm for cloud storage is proposed. An additional discussion of its performance is also provided. The prototype which incorporates the proposed metadata caching algorithm is realized on Luster to evaluate its performance. Comparing experimental results from this study conclude that the metadata caching subsystem can improve the performance of cloud storage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

584-590

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.Roselli, J.Lorch, and T.Anderson. A Comparison of File System Workloads. Proceedings of the 2000 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, page 41-54, June 2000.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Satyanarayanan, J.J. Kistler, P. Kumar, M.E. Okasaki, E.H. Siegel, and D.C. Steere. Coda: A Highly Available File System for Distributed Workstation Environments. IEEE Transaction on Computers, vol. 39, no. 4, Apr. 1990.

DOI: 10.1109/12.54838

Google Scholar

[3] E. Riedel, M. Kallahalla, and R. Swaminathan. A Framework for Evaluating Storage System Security. Proc. First Usenix Conference on File and Storage Technology, pp.15-30, Mar. 2002.

Google Scholar

[4] S.A. Weil, K.T. Pollack, S.A. Brandt, E.L. Miller. Dynamic Metadata Management for Petabyte-Scale File Systems. ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, DC, USA, 2004:4

DOI: 10.1109/sc.2004.22

Google Scholar

[5] Brandt S A, Lan Xue, Miller. Efficient metadata management in large distributed file systems: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/11th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage System and Technologies. San Diego, 2003:290-297.

DOI: 10.1109/mass.2003.1194865

Google Scholar

[6] Weijia Li, Wei Xue, Jiwu Shu, Weimin Zheng. Dynamic Hashing: Adaptive Metadata Management for Petabyte-scale File Systems. The IEEE Conference On Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, Maryland, USA, May, 2006.

Google Scholar

[7] Yifeng Zhu, Hong Jiang, Jun Wang, et al. HBA: Distributed Metadata Management for Large Cluster-Based Storage Systems. IEEE Transaction on Parallel and Distributed Systems , 2008, 19(6):750-763.

DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2007.70788

Google Scholar

[8] Andrew Leung, Minglong Shao, Timothy Bisson, Shankar Pasupathy, Ethan L. Miller, Spyglass: Fast, Scalable Metadata Search for Large-Scale Storage Systems, Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies, February 2009:153-166.

Google Scholar

[9] Mu Fei, Xue Wei, Shu Jiwu, Zhen Weimin. Metadata management mechanism based on route directory. Journal of Tsinghua University, 2009, Vol 49, No.8:1229-1232

Google Scholar

[10] Peter J. Braam. The Lustre Storage Architecture. Cluster File Systems, Inc. 2003.10

Google Scholar