Evaluation of 3D Geo-Positioning Based on Bias-Compensated RPCs for Across-Track QuickBird Stereo Imagery

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper investigates the geo-positioning accuracy of across-track QuickBird stereo imagery in Shanghai, China, where the terrain relief is very low about 3m but with very high buildings up to 380m. The rational function model (RFM) and the bias-compensated RFM with different parameters are employed to do accuracy analysis with different configurations of ground control points (GCPs). The systematic errors in vendor provided RPCs are revealed and discussed. The results of bias-compensated RFM show that different strategies in terms of the number of GCP and different geometric correction methods should be taken into consideration in order for a better and reasonable positioning accuracy in the three directions. The results also show that the best accuracy of 0.6m in horizontal direction and 0.8m in vertical direction can be acquired by the second-order polynomial model when GCPs are more than 8.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1958-1964

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Li: Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 64, no. 12, pp.1165-1170, Dec. (1998).

Google Scholar

[2] DigitalGlobe, Inc. QuickBird Imagery Products-Product Guide, Revision 5. 0. Mar. 31, 2009, available: http: /www. digitalglobe. com/file. php/646/QuickBird_Imagery_Products-Product_Guide. pdf.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Habib, S.W. Shin, K. Kim, C. Kim, K. Bang, E.M. Kim, and D. C, Lee: Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 73, no. 11, pp.1241-1251, Nov. (2007).

DOI: 10.14358/pers.73.11.1241

Google Scholar

[4] R. Li, F. Zhou, X. Niu, and K. Di: Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 73, no. 9, pp.1067-1074, Sep. (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] G. Qiao, W. Wang, B. Wu, C. Liu, and R. Li: Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 76, no. 8, pp.923-934, Aug. (2010).

Google Scholar

[6] G. Zhou and R. Li: Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 66, no. 9, pp.1103-1112, Sep. (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Hu and C.V. Tao: Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 68, no. 7, pp.715-723, Jul. (2002).

Google Scholar

[8] K. Di, R. Ma, and R. Li: Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 69, no. 1, pp.33-41, Jan. (2003).

Google Scholar

[9] C.S. Fraser, G. Dial, and J. Grodecki: Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 60, no. 3, pp.182-194, May. (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] C.V. Tao and Y. Hu: Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 67, no. 12, pp.1347-1357, Dec. (2001).

Google Scholar

[11] R. Li, K. Di, and R. Ma: Marine Geodesy, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp.107-115, Jan. (2003).

Google Scholar

[12] J. Wang, K. Di, and R. Li: ASCE J. Survey. Eng., vol. 131, no. 2, pp.35-42, May. (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] C.S. Fraser, H.B. Hanley: Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 71, no. 8, pp.909-915, Aug. (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] S. Ji: Urban Geotechnical Investigation. Surveying, vol. 22, no. 5, pp.12-14, May. (2007).

Google Scholar