Exergoeconomic Analysis of Parallel Polygeneration System with CO-Riched Gas once through

Article Preview

Abstract:

Polygeneration energy systems have been widely accepted because of their superiority over conventional stand-alone plants in energy efficiency and emissions control. Coal-based polygeneration system, especially producing methanol and electricity, will play an important role in Chinese sustainable developing energy system. Researches indicate that the parallel polygeneration system producing methanol and electricity with CO-riched gas once through (PCGOT) has higher comprehensive profitability and higher reliability, but the systemic and objective evaluation to PCGOT is lacking. In this paper, the matrix mode exergoeconomic method is adopted to analyze the PCGOT. Some indices, such as exergy cost coefficient, unit exergoeconomic cost, cost difference and exergoeconomic coefficient, etc. are calculated and analyzed by using exergoeconomics theory. Based on the analysis, the direction for further improvement is pointed out, and the energy flows with different qualities in different parts of system are given the rationally fixed prices. The calculated electricity cost is 0.22RMB/ (kW•h) and methanol cost 1118RMB/t while coal price is 500 RMB/t. In addition, the coal price sensitivity analysis is conducted, the results show that when the coal price reaches 800RMB/t, the electricity cost is higher than Shanxi province average on-grid power tariff 0.304RMB/ (kW•h) in 2011, when the coal price reaches 1000RMB/t, the methanol cost is higher than methanol factory prices 2000RMB/t at present.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2671-2679

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] NI WD, ZHENG HT, LI Z, Jiang N. Polygeneration: A Very Important Way to Overcome Five Challenges in Energy Field of China. Power Engineering 2003; 2: 2245-2246.

Google Scholar

[2] NI WD. Polygeneration system based on gasification. Shanxi Energy and Conservation. 2009; 4: 1-6.

Google Scholar

[3] Lin H, Jin HG, Gao L, Han W. Economic analysis of coal-based polygeneration system for methanol and power production. Energy 2010; 35: 858–863.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.08.007

Google Scholar

[4] Ma LW. Research on polygeneration system methanol and electricity based on coal gasification. Tsinghua University; (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Wang YB, Li Z, Ni WD. Comprehensive performance assessing of polygeneration system by AHP hierarchy analysis method. Power Eng 2006; 26: 580-586.

Google Scholar

[6] Wang YB, Ni WD, Li Z. Thermo-economic analysis of polygeneration energy system. Coal Convers 2005; 28: 57-61.

Google Scholar

[7] Wang JX, Zhang HL. Power engineering economics. Beijing, China: China Electric Power Press; (1995).

Google Scholar

[8] VALERO A, SERRA L, UCHE J. Fundamentals of thermoeconomics. EURO Summer Course on Sustainable Assessment of Clean Air Technologies; (2001).

Google Scholar

[9] UCHE J, SERRA L, VAL ERO A. Thermoeconomic optimization of a dual-purpose and desalination plant. Desalination 2001; 136: 147-158.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(01)00177-1

Google Scholar

[10] HAO YH, WANG LM, QIU LX. Thermoeconomic evaluation of MSW incineration power-generation system. Thermal Power Generation 2007; 6: 18-21.

Google Scholar

[11] Li Z, Liu P, He F, Wang MH, Efstratios N, Pistikopoulos. Simulation and exergoeconomic analysis of a dual-gas sourced polygeneration process with integrated methanol/DME/DMC catalytic synthesis. Computers and Chemical Eng 2011; 1–6.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.01.015

Google Scholar

[12] Zhu MS. Energy system's exergy analysis. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press; (1988).

Google Scholar

[13] A.P. HINDERINK, F.P.J.M. KERKHOF, A.B.K. LIE, DE SWAAN ARONS, H.J. VAN DER KOOI. Exergy analysis with a flowssheeting simulator-I theory; calculating exergies of material streams. Chemical Enigeering Science 1996; 20: 4693-4700.

DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(96)00220-5

Google Scholar

[14] Wang ZF, Zheng DX, Jin HG. Energy integration of acetylene and power polygeneration by flowrate-exergy diagram. Applied Energy 2009; 86: 372–379.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.05.011

Google Scholar

[15] Chen XJ, Chen TK. Boiler Principle. Beijing, China: Mechanical industry press; (1991).

Google Scholar

[16] Ma LW, Ni WD, Li Z. Analysis of the Polygeneration system of Methanol an electricity based on coal gasification (1). Power Eng 2004; 24: 453.

Google Scholar

[17] Yu GW, Xu YY, Hao X, Li YW, Liu GQ. Process analysis for polygeneration of Fischer–Tropsch liquids and power with CO2 capture based on coal gasification. Fuel 2010; 89: 1070–1076.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.01.016

Google Scholar

[18] Hu L, Jin HG, Gao L, Han W. Techno-economic evaluation of coal-based polygeneration systems of synthetic fuel and power with CO2 recovery. Energy Conversion and Management 2011; 52: 274–283.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.068

Google Scholar

[19] Thomas A. Adams II, Paul I. Barton. Combining coal gasification and natural gas reforming for efficient polygeneration. Fuel Processing Technology 2011; 92: 639–655.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.023

Google Scholar