Critical Risks Influencing the Application of EERTs in Australian Green Office Buildings

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper aims to explore the risks of applying energy efficient and renewable technologies (EERTs) in Australian green office buildings. An online questionnaire survey was conducted in several Australian states and territories to identify and evaluate the potential critical risks that may influence the implementation of EERTs. Consisting of architects, engineers, project managers, and contractors, participants of the survey were asked to evaluate the generic and some specific EERTs risks occurring in the implementation of a selected number of commonly used EERTs in Australian green office buildings. In addition, the participants were asked to pinpoint those stakeholders who were the most affected by the risks and the lifecycle stage of the technology or buildings at which these risks might mostly occur. The data analysis results shows that uncertain governmental policies were identified as the critical risk with the highest mean risk impact value, Lack of access to funds and Presence of system constraints were the most popular risks with influences on most of EERTs. It also identifies the EERTs owners as most affected stakeholders by EERTs risks and that the majority of these risks occur during the operation stage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

513-524

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Lam, E. Chan, C. Poon, C. Chau, K. Chun,, Factors affecting the implementation of green specifications in construction, Journal of Environmental Management, 3 (2010) 654-661.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.029

Google Scholar

[2] GBCA, The dollars and sense of green buildings, Green Building Council Australia, Sydney, 2008.

Google Scholar

[3] I. Mosly, G. Zhang, Review of risks for the implementation of energy efficient and renewable technologies in green office buildings, in: Proceedings of the Sustainable Building Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, May 26 – 28, 2010.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Lombard, J. Ortiz, C. Pout, A review on buildings energy consumption information, Energy and Buildings, 3 (2008) 394-398.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007

Google Scholar

[5] P. Torcellini, S. Pless, M. Deru, Zero energy buildings: A critical look at the definition, ACEEE Sumer Study, Pacific Grove, California, 2006.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Modarres, Risk Analysis in Engineering: Techniques, Tools and Trends, Florida CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, 2006.

Google Scholar

[7] AS/NZS, Risk management guidelines companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004, Australia/New Zealand Standards, Wellington, 2004.

Google Scholar

[8] I. Mosly, G. Zhang, Study on risk management for the implementation of energy efficient and renewable technologies in green office buildings, in: Proceedings of the Transition to Sustainability Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, November/December 30 – 03, 2010.

Google Scholar

[9] B. Sovacool, The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy efficiency policy, Energy Policy, 4 (2009) 1529 – 1541.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.016

Google Scholar

[10] A. Singh, S. Srivastava, R. Shrestha, Barriers to adoption of clean and efficient technologies in the Indian power sector: an analysis using AHP, in: BAQ Conference, Yogyakatra, Indonesia, December 13 – 15, 2006.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3440327

Google Scholar

[11] J. Pinkse, M. Dommisse, Overcoming barriers to sustainability: an explanation of residential builders reluctance to adopt clean technologies, Business Strategy and the Environment, 8 (2009) 515 – 527.

DOI: 10.1002/bse.615

Google Scholar

[12] B. Reddy, R. Shrestha, Barriers to the adoption of efficient electricity technologies: a case study of India, International Journal of Energy Research, 3 (1998) 257 – 270.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-114x(19980310)22:3<257::aid-er358>3.3.co;2-3

Google Scholar

[13] J. Painuly, Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis, Renewable Energy, 1 (2001) 73 – 89.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-1481(00)00186-5

Google Scholar

[14] H. Feustel, C. Stetiu, Hydronic radiant cooling– preliminary assessment, Energy and Buildings, 3 (1995) 193 – 205.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-7788(95)00922-k

Google Scholar

[15] M. Henderson, Application of chilled technology in modern office buildings, in: Natura Hybrid or Air-conditioning Conference, Melbourne, Australia, September 17, 2003.

Google Scholar

[16] G. Zhang, J. Yang, Factors influencing the implementation of the raised floor system in Australian office buildings, Construction Management and Economics, 5 (2006) 529 – 543.

DOI: 10.1080/01446190600568025

Google Scholar

[17] P. Hinton, C. Brownlow, I. McMurray, B. Cozens, SPSS explained, Routledge, Hove, United Kingdom, 2004.

Google Scholar

[18] J. Mankins, Technology readiness and risk assessment: A new approach, Acta Astronautica, 9-10 (2009) 1208-1215.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.059

Google Scholar

[19] A. Field, Discovering Statistics using SPSS, 3rd edt, SAGE publications Ltd, London, United Kingdom, 2009.

Google Scholar