Electrical Characteristic Analysis of Electrical Capacitance and Resistance Dual-Modality Tomography Sensor Based on Metal-Wall

Article Preview

Abstract:

The electrical field finite element mathematical model of electrical capacitance and resistance dual-modality tomography sensor has been established. The dual-modality tomography sensors are installed on the different cross-section of the same pipeline with metal-wall. The electrical characteristic of dual-modality sensing fields was analysized. The simulation result of the provided theoretical model is the basis for dual-modality imaging algorithm and information fusion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1060-1063

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Dyakowski, G.A. Johansen and B.T. Hjertaker 2005 A Dual Modality Tomography system for Imaging Gas/Solids Word Congress on Industrial Process Tomography. 4(Aizu, Japan) 669-74.

Google Scholar

[2] B S Hoyle, X Jia and F J W Podd 2001 Design and Application of a Multi-modal Process Tomography System Sci. Technol. 12 1157-65.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Qiu, B.S. Hoyle and F.J.W. Podd 2007 Engineering and application of a dual-modality process tomography system Flow Measurement and Instrumentation . 18 247-54.

DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2007.07.008

Google Scholar

[4] J L Davidson, L S Ruffino and D R Stephenson 2004 Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography applied to a metal-walled filtration test platform Meas. Sci and Technol . 15 2263-74.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/15/11/012

Google Scholar

[5] Yan H, Shao Fuqun and Wang Shi 1998 Fast calculation of sensitivity distributions in capacitance tomography sensor Electronics Letters . 34(20) 1936-37.

DOI: 10.1049/el:19981176

Google Scholar

[6] Tadakuni M and Yukio K 1985 Electrical Impedance Computed Tomography Based on A Finite Element Model IEEE Trans. on BME . 32(3) 177-84.

DOI: 10.1109/tbme.1985.325526

Google Scholar