Channel Modelling for WBANs

Article Preview

Abstract:

Development of an appropriate propagation channel model is an important step to design wireless body area network (WBAN). Because the human body has different body shapes (male, female and child), different tissues with different permittivity and conductivity (even the same person at the different age), and limbs positions and postures are changing all the time, this made the in-body channel modelling extremely difficult, if not impossible. There are few publications on implant communication channel models compared to wearable WBAN. In this paper, we present a literature survey on radio channel modelling for WBAN, especially the IEEE 802.15.6 models. The performance of the model is studied by simulating probability density functions (PDF) and cumulative distribution functions (CDF). Finally, we briefly outline some aspects of our future research works.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

346-350

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] World Health organization (WHO), http: /www. who. int.

Google Scholar

[2] T. G. Zimmerman. Personal area networks: near-field intrabody communication. IBM systems Journal, 1996, vol. 35, no. 3 & 4, pp.609-617.

DOI: 10.1147/sj.353.0609

Google Scholar

[3] Shuo Xiao, Ashay Dhamdhere, Vijay Sivaraman, and Alison Burdett. Transmission Power Control in Body Area Sensor Networks for Healthcare Monitoring. IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 27, NO. 1, JANUARY (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2009.090105

Google Scholar

[4] Sana Ullah, Henry Higgins, Bin Shen and Kyung Sup Kwak. On the implant communication and MAC protocols for WBAN. International Journal of Communication Systems, Int. J. Commun. Syst. Wiley InterScience. (2010).

DOI: 10.1002/dac.1100

Google Scholar

[5] Sana Ullah, Pervez Khan, Niamat Ullah, Shahnaz Saleem, Henry Higgins, and Kyung Sup Kwak. A Review of Wireless Body Area Networks for Medical Applications. ArXiv: 1001. 0831v3 [cs. NI] 3 Aug (2010).

DOI: 10.4236/ijcns.2009.28093

Google Scholar

[6] Harri Viittala, Matti Hämäläinen, Jari Iinatti, Attaphongse Taparugssanagorn. Different experimental WBAN channel models and IEEE802. 15. 6 models: comparison and effects. 2nd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL 2009), Bratislava, Slovakia, Nov. 24-27, (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/isabel.2009.5373626

Google Scholar

[7] John Hagedorn, Judith Terrill, Wenbin Yang, Kamran Sayrafian, Kamya Yazdandoost, Ryuji Kohno. A Statistical Path Loss Model for MICS. IEEE 802. 15-08-0519-01-0006, September (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] Anders J Johansson, http: /citeseerx. ist. psu. edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10. 1. 1. 7. 5752.

Google Scholar

[9] IEEE 802. 15 WPAN Task Group 6 (TG6) Body Area Networks. IEEE P802. 15-08-0780-10-0006 [Online]. Available: http: /www. ieee802. org/15/pub/TG6. html.

Google Scholar

[10] FCC MICS Bands, http: /wireless. fcc. gov/services/index. htm?job=service_home&id=medical_implant.

Google Scholar

[11] Huseyin S. Savci, Ahmet Sula, Zheng Wang, Numan S. Dogan, and Ercument Arvas, MICS transceivers: regulatory standards and applications, in IEEE SoutheastCon Proceedings, April 2005, p.179–182.

DOI: 10.1109/secon.2005.1423241

Google Scholar

[12] H.B. Li, J. Schwoerer, Y.M. Yoon, J. Farserotu, W. Yang, K. Sayrafian, D. Miniutti, D. Lewis, A. Gowans, and J. Moss, IEEE 802. 15. 6 Regulation Subcommittee Report, IEEE 802. 15 Working Group Document, IEEE P802. 15-08-0034-11-0006, Sept. (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] F. Molisch et al., IEEE 802. 15. 4a channel model-final report, IEEE P802. 15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) (IEEE 802. 15-04-0662-01-04a, Sept. 2004).

Google Scholar

[14] Karacolak T, Cooper R, Topsakal E, Electrical Properties of Rat Skin and Design of Implantable Antennas for Medical Wireless Telemetry, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol 57, No 9, Sept. 2009, pp.2806-2812.

DOI: 10.1109/tap.2009.2027197

Google Scholar