Experimental Investigation about Dynamic Bond-Slip between Reinforcing Steel Bar and Concrete

Abstract:

The aim of the present research is to assess the dynamic performance of bond-slip between reinforcing steel bar and concrete. Precisely, the sensitivity of the bond stress-displacement relationship in the interface between reinforcing steel bar and concrete to strain rate is investigated. In this paper, the reinforcing steel bar/concrete specimens were tested in dynamic push-out experiments with modified split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system. The incident bar was used to apply compressive loading to single steel bar embedded in a surrounding concrete. Using this technique, the debonding progress was analyzed. Besides, the effect of loading rate and effective depth on the push-out tests was studied with the impact velocities in the range of 9 m/s - 29 m/s. It is seen that maximum push-out force increases with increasing loading rate. In addition, the dynamic interface bond force does not proportionally increase with the effective depth of steel bar.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 249-250)
• Pages: 1073-1081
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.249-250.1073
• Online since: December 2012
• Authors: Wei Yao, Hai Jun Wu, Feng Lei Huang
• Keywords: Debonding, Dynamic Push-Out Experiment, Split Hopkinson Bar, Steel Bar Concrete Interface

References

[1] P. Bartos, Review paper: Bond in fiber reinforced cements and concretes, The International Journal of Cement Composites, 3 (1981) 159-177.

DOI: 10.1016/0262-5075(81)90049-x

[2] R. Eligehausen, E.P. Popov, V.V. Bertero, Local bond stress-slip relationships of deformed bars under generalized excitations, Rep. No. 83/23, Earthquake Engineering Research Center. (EERC), University of California, Berkeley, California. (1983).

[3] A.H. Nilson, Internal measurement of bond-slip, ACI, 69 (1972) 439-441.

[4] Z.M. Teng, J. Lin, Local bond stress-slip relationships for cyclic reversal loadings, Ph.D. thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, (1998).

[5] Y.Q. Wang, F.Z. Wang, Simulation of bond-slip relationship between concrete and reinforcing bar in ANSYS, Journal of Tianjin University, 39 (2006) 209-213.

[6] X.W. Liang, Y.X. Ye, The nonlinear analysis of concrete structures, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China, (2007).

[7] E. Vos, H.W. Reinhardt, Influence of loading rate on bond behavior of reinforcing steel and prestressing strands, Materials and Structures, 15 (1982) 3-10.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02473553

[8] L.J. Malvar, Bond stress-slip characteristics of FRP rebars, Rep. TR-2013-SHR, Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, California. (1994).

[9] E. Cosenza, G. Manfredi, R. Realfonzo, Bond characteristics and anchorage length of FRP rebars, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, Montreal: M.M. El-Badry, 1996, pp.11-14.

[10] E. Cosenza, G. Manfredi, R. Realfonzo, Behavior and modeling of bond of FRP rebars to concrete, Journal of Composites for Construction, 1 (1997) 40-51.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(1997)1:2(40)

[11] F. Focacci, A. Nanni, C.E. Bakis, Local bond-slip relationship for FRP reinforcement in concrete, Journal of Composites for Construction, 2 (2000) 24-31.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2000)4:1(24)

[12] H. Reinhardt, W. Blaauwendraad, J.E. Vos, Prediction of bond between steel and concrete by numerical analysis, Materials and Structures, 17 (1984) 311-320.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02479089

[13] H.W. Reinhardt, H.A. Kormeling, A.J. Zislinski, The split Hopkinson bar, a versatile tool for the impact testing of concrete, Materials and Structures, 19 (1986) 55-63.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02472311

[14] J.H. Weathersby, Investigation of bond slip between concrete and steel reinforcement under dynamic loading conditions, Ph.D. thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, May (2003).

DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.1649

[15] X.D. Li, L. Ye, K.X. Liu, Experimental and calculative research on the dynamic bond strength of the interface between steel and cement morta, Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universtiy Pekinensis, 44 (2008) 1-5.

[16] H. Wu, Y. Lu, F. Huang, et al, Numerical simulation about dynamic bond-slip between reinforcing steel bar and concrete, DYMAT, (2009) 1669-1676. DOI: 10. 1051/dymat/2009236.

DOI: 10.1051/dymat/2009236

[17] M. Haskett, D.J. Oehlers, M.S. Mohamed Ali, Local and global bond characteristics of steel reinforcing bars, Engineering Structures, 30 (2008) 376-383.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.007

[18] M.S. Mohamed Ali, D.J. Oehlers, R. Seracino, Vertical shear interaction model between external FRP transverse plates and internal steel stirrups, Engineering Structures, 28 (2006) 381-389.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.010

[19] D.J. Oehlers, R. Seracino, Design of FRP and steel plated RC structures, Elsevier, Oxford, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044548-9/50008-2

[20] G. Solomos, M. Berra, Testing of anchorages in concrete under dynamic tensile loading, Material and Structures, 39 (2006) 695-706.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9112-1

[21] H. Kolsky, An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading, Proceedings of physics Society, B62 (1949) 676.

[22] X. Bi, Z. Li, P.H. Geubelle, J. Lambros, Dynamic Fiber Debonding and Frictional Push-out in Model Composite Systems: Numerical Observations, Mechanics of Materials, 34 (2002) 433-446.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6636(02)00141-2

[23] Z.H. Li, X.P. Bi, J. Lambros, H.P. Geubelle, Dynamic fiber debonding and frictional push-out in model composite systems: experimental observations, Experimental Mechanics, 42 (2002) 417-425.

DOI: 10.1177/001448502321548256

[24] R.J. Kerans, T.A. Parthasarathy, Theoretical analysis of the fiber pull-out and push-out tests, Journal American Ceramic Society, 74 (1991) 1585-1596.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07144.x

[25] V.T. Bechel, N.R. Sottos, Application of debond length measurements to examine the mechanics of fiber push-out, Experimental Mechanics, (1994) 171-180.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5096(97)00040-9