A Strain Sensing Structural Health Monitoring System for Delaminated Composite Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) for composite materials is becoming a primary task due to their extended use in safety critical applications. Different methods, based on the use of piezoelectric transducers as well as of fiber optics, has been successfully proposed to detect and monitor damage in composite structural components with particular attention focused on delamination cracks.In the present paper a Structural Health Monitoring model, based on the use of piezoelectric sensors, already proposed by the authors for isotropic damaged components, is extended to delaminated composite structures. The dynamic behavior of the host damaged structure and the bonded piezoelectric sensors is modeled by means of a boundary element approach based on the Dual Reciprocity BEM. The sensitivity of the piezoelectric sensors has been studied by varying the delamination length characterizing the skin/stiffener debonding phenomenon of composite structures undergoing dynamic loads.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

849-855

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. K. Noor, Structure Technology for future Aerospace Systems, AIAA, Reston, VA, (2000).

Google Scholar

[2] N. D. Ngo and K. K. Tamma, An integrated comprehensive approach tothe modeling of resin transfermolded composite manufactured net-shaped parts, CMES 5(2) 2004 103-133.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Grondel, J. Assaad, C. Delebarre, and E. Moulin, Health monitoringof composite wingbox structure, Ultrasonics 42 2004 819-82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.058

Google Scholar

[4] W. Staszewski, S. Mahzan, and R. Traynor, Health monitoring of aerospace composite structures-active and passive approach, Composites Science and Technology 69 2009 1678-1685.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.034

Google Scholar

[5] W. Staszewski, C. Boller, and G. Tomlison, Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures - Smart sensor technologies and signal processing, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, (2004).

DOI: 10.1002/0470092866

Google Scholar

[6] D. Balageas, C. Fritzen, and A. Guemes, Structural Health Monitoring, ISTE, London, UK, (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] I. Chopra, Review of State of Art of Smart Structures and IntegratedSystems, AIAA Journal 40(10) 2002 2145-87.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Monnier, LambWaves-based Impact Damage Monitoring of a Stiffened Aircraft Panel using Piezoelectric Transducers, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 17(5) 2006 411-421.

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x06058630

Google Scholar

[9] V. Giurgiutiu, Tuned Lamb Wave Excitation and Detection with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 16(4) 2005 291-305.

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x05050106

Google Scholar

[10] D.M. Peairs,G. Park, D.J. Inman, Improving Accessibility of the Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring Method, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 15 2004 129-139.

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x04039914

Google Scholar

[11] T. Liu, V. Martin andK. Sritawat, Modelling the input–output behaviour of piezoelectric structural health monitoring systems for composite plates, SmartMaterials and Structures 12(5)2003 836-844.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/12/5/021

Google Scholar

[12] A. Alaimo , A. Milazzo , C. Orlando, A boundary element model for piezoelectric dynamic strain sensing of cracked structures, Advances in Boundary Element Techniques XII. BETEQ 2011. 13-15 July (2011), Brasilia, Brazil.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Beuth, Separation of crack extension modes in orthotropic delamination models, International Journal of Fracture, 77 1996 305-321.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00036249

Google Scholar

[14] S. Narayan, and J. Beuth, Designation of mode mix in orthotropic composite delamination problems, International Journal of Fracture 90 1998 383-400.

Google Scholar

[15] D.M. Barnett, J. Lothe, Dislocations and line charges in anisotropicpiezoelectric insulators, Physics State Solid (b) 67 1975 105-111.

Google Scholar

[16] G. Davì, A. Milazzo, Multidomain boundary integral formulation for piezoelectric materials fracture mechanics, International Journal of Solids and Structures 38 2001 7065-70782001.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(00)00416-9

Google Scholar

[17] P.W. Partridge, C.A. Brebbia, L.C. Wrobel, The Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method, Computational Mechanics Publication, (1992).

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3690-7_7

Google Scholar

[18] A. Alaimo, A. Milazzo, C. Orlando, On the Dynamic Behavior of Piezoelectric Active Repair by the Boundary Element Method, J. of Intelligent Mat. Systems and Structures22 2011 2137-2146.

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x11425281

Google Scholar

[19] J.C. Houbolt, Journal of Aeronautical Science, 17 1950 540-550.

Google Scholar

[20] M. H. Aliabadi, The Boundary Element Method, Vol. 2, Wiley, (2002).

Google Scholar

[21] A. Alaimo, A. Milazzo and C. Orlando, Boundary elements analysis ofadhesively bonded piezoelectric active repair Engineering Fracture Mechanics 76 2009 500-511.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.10.008

Google Scholar

[22] C. Renaud, and Z.Q. Feng, BEM and FEM analysis of Signorini contactproblems with friction, Computational Mechanics 31 2003 390-399.

DOI: 10.1007/s00466-003-0441-4

Google Scholar

[23] B. Lin and V. Giurgiutiu, Modeling and testing of PZT and PVDF piezoelectric wafer active sensors, Smart Materials and Structures 15 2006 1085-1093.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/15/4/022

Google Scholar

[24] K. Kuang, S. Quekand W. Cantwell, Use of polymer sensors for monitoring the static and dynamic response of a cantilever composite beam, Journal of Material Science 39 2004 3839-3843.

DOI: 10.1023/b:jmsc.0000030752.16977.0b

Google Scholar