Scheme of Model Updating and Implement for Structural Dynamics Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Model updating techniques are used to modify structural model for more accurate predictions of dynamics behavior. A simple survey on the model updating methods and correlation criteria is presented. Based on the inverse eigensensitivity method (IESM) and modal assurance criterion (MAC), a scheme of model updating for structures is presented and realized by user defined subroutine combined with APDL in commercial software ANSYS®. A four-DOF spring-mass system is assumed and updated, from which the predicted frequencies and MAC values are satisfied compared to the actual dynamics characteristics. This gives evidence that the presented model updating scheme is feasible and efficient. Furthermore, a cylindrical shell structure containing global and local modal information is established to research the updating ability of the scheme on some focused local modal information. The results due to the updated model of cylindrical shell structure show that not only the global modal data but also the local modal data have a good agreement with that of the actual structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

140-143

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.E. Mottershead, M.I. Friswell, Journal of Sound and Vibration 167(2)(1993)347-375.

Google Scholar

[2] S.V. Modak , T.K. Kundra, B.C. Nakra, Computers and structures 80(2002)437-447.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Pascual, M. Razeto, J.C. In: Bethel C T ed. Proceedings of the 15th International Modal Analysis Conference, Society for experimental mechanics, Inc., Japan, 1997. 587-592.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Rong , J. Zheng, F. Xu, Structural Dynamics Modification And Optimal Design. Beijing: China Communication Press(2002).

Google Scholar

[5] J.E. Mottershead, C. Mares, M.I. Rriswell, et al. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (2000)14(6), 923-944.

Google Scholar

[6] E.L. Zhang, P. Feissel, J. Antoni. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics26(2011)550-560.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Mares, C. Surace. Journal of sound and Vibration(1996)195(2), 195-215.

Google Scholar

[8] R.I. Levin, N.A.J. Lieven. Journal of Sound & Vibration(1998)210(5), 593-607.

Google Scholar

[9] Y.T. Chung. In: Bethel C T ed. Proceedings of the 15th International Modal Analysis Conference, Society for experimental mechanics, Inc., Japan, 1997. 818-824.

Google Scholar

[10] R.M. Lin, J. Zhu. Journal of Sound and Vibration303(2007)596-613.

Google Scholar

[11] G. Steenackers, C. Devriendt, P. Guillaume. Journal of Sound and Vibration303(2007)707-722.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Pascual, R. Schalchli, M. Razeto. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 21 (2007) 1008-1025.

Google Scholar

[13] J.P. Combe, P. Ladeveze, J.P. Pelle. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering 176 (1999) 165-185.

Google Scholar