Resolve Product Harm Crisis for Manufacturing System: A Simultaneous Equation Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

Product-harm crisis which can also be defined as: well publicized events wherein products are found to be defective or even dangerous. Product-harm crisis often occurs in manufacturing system and has negative impacts on companies. This paper implemented empirical research and structural equation model to study how repair strategies protect purchase intention of brand and restore satisfaction of manufacturing system. Based on the empirical result, we suggest that managers should consider consumers’ perceived fairness to the repair strategies and focus on how win consumers’ forgiveness, so as to maintain customer satisfaction of manufacturing system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

398-403

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. J. Siomkos and G. Kurzbard. The hidden crisis in product-harm crisis for Manufacturing system: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28(1994), p.30–41.

DOI: 10.1108/03090569410055265

Google Scholar

[2] S. W. Pruitt and D. R. Peterson. Security price reactions around product recall announcements: Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 9(1986), p.113–122.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.1986.tb00441.x

Google Scholar

[3] D. Laufer and K. Gillespie. Differences in consumer attributions of blame between men and women: The role of perceived vulnerability and empathic concern: Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 21(2004), p.141–157.

DOI: 10.1002/mar.10119

Google Scholar

[4] K. Cleeren, M. G. Dekimpe, and K. Helsen. Weathering product-harm crises: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36(2008), p.262–270.

DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0022-8

Google Scholar

[5] N. Dawar and M. M. Pillutla. Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37(2000), p.215–226.

DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.37.2.215.18729

Google Scholar

[6] M. L. McLaughun, M. J. Cody, and H. O'Hair. The Manufacturing system of failure events: Some contextual determinants of accounting behavior: Human Communication Research, Vol. 9(1983), p.208–224.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00695.x

Google Scholar

[7] M. Griffin, B. J. Babin, and J. S. Attaway. An empirical investigation of the impact of negative public publicity on consumer attitudes and intentions: Advances in consumer research, Vol. 18(1991), p.334–341.

Google Scholar

[8] A. A. Marcus and R. S. Goodman. Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis: Academy of Manufacturing system Journal, Vol. 34(1991), p.281–305.

DOI: 10.5465/256443

Google Scholar

[9] G. Siomkos and P. Shrivastava. Responding to product liability crises: Long Range Planning, Vol. 26(1993), p.72–79.

DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(93)90079-u

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Xie and S. Peng. How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: The roles of competence, integrity, beneVolence, and forgiveness: Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 26(2009), p.572–589.

DOI: 10.1002/mar.20289

Google Scholar

[11] A. K. Smith, R. N. Bolton, and J. Wagner. A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters inVolving failure and recovery: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36(1999), p.356–372.

DOI: 10.1177/002224379903600305

Google Scholar

[12] K. Schoefer and C. Ennew. The impact of perceived justice on consumers' emotional responses to service complaint experiences: Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 19(2005), p.261–270.

DOI: 10.1108/08876040510609880

Google Scholar

[13] J. S. Adams. Inequity in social exchange: Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2(1966), p.267–299.

Google Scholar

[14] J. Thibaut and L. Walker, Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. NJ(1975): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale.

Google Scholar

[15] R. J. Bies and J. S. Moag. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness: Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1(1986), p.43–55.

Google Scholar

[16] R. L. Oliver and J. E. Swan. Equity and disconfirmation perceptions as influences on merchant and product satisfaction: The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16(1989), p.372–383.

DOI: 10.1086/209223

Google Scholar

[17] R. L. Oliver. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions: Journal of marketing research, Vol. 17(1980), p.460–469.

DOI: 10.1177/002224378001700405

Google Scholar

[18] S. Ballester, M. T. M. Sastre, and E. Mullet. Forgivingness and lay conceptualizations of forgiveness: Personality and individual differences, Vol. 47(2009), p.605–609.

DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.016

Google Scholar

[19] R. Thaler. Mental accounting and consumer choice: Marketing science, Vol. 4(1985), p.199–214.

Google Scholar

[20] E. Walster, E. Berscheid, and G. W. Walster. New directions in equity research: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 25(1973), p.151–176.

DOI: 10.1037/h0033967

Google Scholar

[21] C. Moorman, G. Zaltman, and R. Deshpande. Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29(1992), p.314–328.

DOI: 10.1177/002224379202900303

Google Scholar

[22] J. Blodgett and G. Jeffrey. The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 73(1997), p.185–210.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4359(97)90003-8

Google Scholar

[23] P. Strelan, N. T. Feather, and I. McKee. Justice and forgiveness: Experimental evidence for compatibility: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 44(2008), p.1538–1544.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.014

Google Scholar

[24] C. Fornell and B. Wernerfelt. Defensive marketing strategy by customer complaint Manufacturing system: a theoretical analysis: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24(1987), p.337–346.

DOI: 10.1177/002224378702400401

Google Scholar

[25] E. J. Finkel, C. E. Rusbult, M. Kumashiro, and P. A. Hannon. Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 82(2002), p.956–974.

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.956

Google Scholar

[26] J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.: Psychological bulletin, Vol. 103(1988), p.411–423.

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Google Scholar