Research on Reverse Logistics Mode and Implementation of EPR

Article Preview

Abstract:

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is a suite of policy tools for reducing the generation of wastes by promoting greater recycling and resource recovery and encouraging more sustainable product design. The concept of EPR and purpose is proposed. Three recovery modes and characteristics of the EPR are analyzed and corresponding implementation measurements are proposed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1032-1035

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Thomas Lindhqvist, Reid Lifset. Can We Take the Concept of Individual Producer Responsibility from Theory to P ractice? . Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2003 (7) : 3- 6.

DOI: 10.1162/108819803322564299

Google Scholar

[2] Li jun, Wei jie. Research and Application overview on reverse logistics based on EPR. Soft Science2010, 24(4): 43-47.

Google Scholar

[3] Chang Xiangyun, Fan Tijun, Huang Jianye. Reverse logistics management mode based on EPR. Modern Management Science. 2006: 35-37.

Google Scholar

[4] REN Ming-ming . Optimal Designment of Incentive Mechanism Based on the Implementation of Extended Producer Responsibility of Electronic Manufacturer. Systems Engineering. 2009, 27(4): 116-120.

Google Scholar

[5] Nnoroma I C, et al. Overview of electronic waste ( e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countris . Resources, Conservation and Recycling , 2008, ( 52) : 843-858.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.01.004

Google Scholar

[6] GUO Jun-hua , LI Bang-yi , NI Ming. Extended Producer Responsibility Sharing Mechanism under Uncertain Demand. Systems Engineering. 2012, 30(1): 21-26.

Google Scholar

[7] Debing N, et al. Social responsibility in two-echelon supply chains: Insight from wholesale price contracts [ J ] . European Journal of Operating Research, 2010, 27( 3) : 1269-1279.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.06.026

Google Scholar