Research on Data Prediction Methods of Structural Health Monitoring System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Trend prediction is virtually modeling process for dynamic data. The key to prediction is to establish a model in accordance with actual status, then use the model to predict the trend of object, and infer its behavior in future. Two prediction methods are researched to predict the trend on the observed points of the structure in this paper, which are regression prediction method and grey prediction method. The continuous time strain value of a measured point on Tianxingzhou Yangtze River Bridge is used as data sample for researching. The method of regression analysis is applied for predicting the trend of short-term data, and the method of grey model prediction for predicting long-term data. Regression prediction can assess the health status of the structure and obtain the alarm information effectively by comparing the actual monitoring data with the range of forecast interval. Grey prediction method has great advantages when dealing with poor information. By engineering example this study shows the pros and cons of these two methods, and proves that the method of grey model prediction is more suitable of predicting the trend of object in the structural health monitoring system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1022-1028

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wei Li. The Structural Health Monitoring System of Large Span Space Structure Based on Field bus [D]. Shenzhen. Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, 2010. (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.18057/ijasc.2016.12.2.2

Google Scholar

[2] F. N. Catbas, K. A. Grimmelsman, A. E. Aktan. Proceedings of Spie-The International Society for Optical Engineering. 2000, 3995: 84-97.

Google Scholar

[3] Feng Lu, Fei Pan, Shenqi Li, i. e. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2001, 29(2): 50~52. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Jian Tang, Jianhui Luan, Chen Lu. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 37(I): 210~212. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Yiping Zeng, Hong Zhu, Wenguang Long. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2004, 33(04): 404~467. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Enlin Li. Statistics and Decision, 2010, 14: 161~162. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Zhiqiang Chen, Xiaojia Wang, Shanlin Yang. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2011, 19: 48~52. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Yongkuo Liu, Chunli Xie, Zhujun Yu, i. e. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2011, 45(90: 1075~1079. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Tangkuman Stenly, Yang Bo-Suk. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 25(12): 2979~2985.

Google Scholar

[10] Minghui Zeng, Xiaoming Du. Shanxi Architecture, 2011, 37(06): 140~141.

Google Scholar

[11] Hongli Sun, Bin Ye, Min Zhao. Shaanxi Coal, 2004, 02: 22~24. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] Jianghuai Wu, The Analysis and Processing of Building Static Deformation Monitoring Data [D]. Shanghai. Tongji University, 2007. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar