Comparison and Analysis of Different Excavation Methods in Soft Rock-Extremely Soft Rock Tunnel

Abstract:

In order to further study the law of surrounding rock deformation of soft rock-extremely soft rock double arch tunnel, resolve problem of tunnel excavation in complex geology conditions, based on project example, the central heading full section, central heading step and division method (three heading method) as research object, measured and simulated results were compared and analyzed, and used ANDIA software to do dynamic simulation. The results show that the characters of surrounding rock deformation are different with different excavation methods; Simulated and measured results are almost the same ,and the maximum difference has only 6%, reflecting simulated value has a certain reliability; The more the step numbers are excavated in soft rock-extremely soft rock tunnel, the smaller the area excavated is, the smaller the rock is disturbance, the smaller the surface subsidence and two state convergence value is, more be able to meet construction requirements; Compared with the other two methods, division method is more to reduce the deformation in the surrounding rock with class of V.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 256-259)
• Pages: 1201-1205
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.256-259.1201
• Online since: December 2012
• Authors: Xiang Dong Zhang, Peng Tao Zhao, Wen Jun Gu
• Keywords: ADINA Software, Central Heading Full Section Method, Central Heading Step Method, Division Method (Three Heading Method), Dynamic Simulation, Soft Rock-Extreme Soft Rock, Surrounding Rock Deformation

References

[1] ZHANG Xiangdong, LIU Yan, SUN Chuang. Numerical simulation and analysis of soft rock tunnel[J].Journal of Guangxi University(Natural Science Edition),2010,35(1):73～77.(in Chinese))

[2] YANG Huijun, WANG Mengshu. Analysis on construction factors of surrounding rock deformation in tunneling works [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2006, 28(3): 92～96. (in Chinese))

[3] WEI Bingxu, TANG Huixiang, CHEN You. Comparison of effect and analysis of simulation of CRD and step method in the tunnel excavation [J]. Road of Inland and Outland, 2011, 31(4): 192～195. (in Chinese))

[4] PELLI FKAISER P K, MORGERNSTERN N R. Three-dimensional simulation of rock line interaction near tunnel face[C]//Proceedingsofthe2ndInternationalSymposiumonNumerical Model sin Geo-mechanics. Ghent: [S. N.], 1986: 359-368.

[5] SWOBODAG, MERTZW, SCHMIDA. Three-dimensional numerical model to simulate tunnel excavation[C]// Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Numerical Models in Geo-mechanics. Niagara Falls: [S. N.], 1989:536-548.

[6] ZHAO Yong. Study on Dynamic Deformation Rules and Control Technology of Surrounding Rock for Tunnel [J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2010, 34(4): 1~5. (in Chinese))

[7] ZHAO Chunyan, HAO Zhe, ZHU Fusheng. Time Sequenced Analysis on Rock Deformation of Large Span Road Tunnel [J]. Global Geology, 2009, 28(3): 361~366. (in Chinese)

[8] YANG Changxian, CUI Guangyao, WANG Leming. Time Shared ratio of pressure in secondary lining based on field monitoring and measuring in highway tunnel [J]. Global Geology, 2012, 31(1): 193~198. (in Chinese)