Assessing the Impact of Climate on Actual Crop Water Use over Irrigated Rice and Rape in East China Plain over Four Decades

Abstract:

Evapotranspiration (ET) is an important component of the water cycle at field, regional and global scales. This study used measured data from a 40-year (1970–2009) in the East China plain on Rape and Rice to analyze the impacts of climatic factors on actual crop water use and crop yield. The results showed that grass reference evapotranspiration (ET0, calculated by FAO Penmen Monteith method) was relatively constant from 1970 to 2009. Average seasonal crop water use was 250 mm and 154 mm for Rice and Rape, respectively, over the four decades. The seasonal decrease in crop water use was around 1.4 mm per season for Rice, and 0.08 mm per season for Rape. Average seasonal effective rain was 456 mm and 120 mm for Rice and Rape, respectively, over the four decades. The seasonal increase in effective rain was around 0.7 mm per season for Rice, and 0.03 mm per season for Rape. The result showed that over the four decades actual crop water use decrease much greater than the increase in effective rainfall. The results also showed that with new cultivars and improved management practices it was possible to further increase grain production without much increase in water use.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 256-259)
• Pages: 2557-2564
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.256-259.2557
• Online since: December 2012
• Authors: Mohamed Khaled Salahou, Xiu Ju Zhang
• Keywords: CROPWAT, Evapotranspiration, Penman-Monteith Method

References

[11] Smith, M. (1992). "Report on the expert consultation on revision of FAO methodologies for crop water requirements." Div. of Land and Water Development, FAO, Rome.

[12] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 1992. CROPWAT, a computer program for irrigation planning and management. Author, Smith M. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 46, Rome, Italy.

[13] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 1993. CLIMWAT for CROPWAT. Author, Smith M. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 49. Rome, Italy.

[14] Pallant, J., 2007. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (Version 10). Open University press. Buckingham, Philadelphia.

[15] Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A., Francia, E., Marè, C., Tondelli, A., Stanca, A., 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res. 105, 1–14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004

[16] Shearman, V.J., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Scott, R.K., Foulkes, M.J., 2005. Physiological processes associated with wheat yield progress in the UK. Crop Sci. 45, 175–185.

DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0175a

[17] Siddique, K.H.M., Belford, R.K., Tennant, D., 1990. Root: Shoot ratio of old and modern, tall and semidwarf wheat in a Meditertanean environment. Plant Soil 121, 89–98.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00013101

[18] Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., Fereres, E., 2007. On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity. Irrig. Sci. 25, 189–207.

DOI: 10.1007/s00271-007-0064-1

[19] Wong, S.C., Cowan, I.R., Farquhar, G.D., 1979. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282, 424–426.

DOI: 10.1038/282424a0

[20] Lu, Z.M., Percy, R.G., Qualset, C.O., Zeiger, E., 1998. Stomatal conductance predicts yields in irrigated Pima cotton and bread wheat grown at high temperatures. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 453–460.

DOI: 10.1093/jxb/49.special_issue.453