An Improved Magnitude Estimation Method Using Combination of Predominant Period and Peak Amplitude for Earthquake Early Warning

Article Preview

Abstract:

The critical technology of Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) is determining the size of an earthquake and the predicted ground motion at given site, from the first few seconds of the P wave arrivals. Currently, there were two different approaches to the EEW magnitude estimation, the predominant period method and the peak amplitude method. However, both methods mentioned above had some disadvantages, such as significant uncertainty and saturation at great magnitude. To improve the results of magnitude estimation, a combined method using predominant period τc and peak amplitude of acceleration Pmax was introduced. Compared with the predominant period method and the peak amplitude method, the estimation standard deviation level of the combined method is 0.42 using NSMP strong motion data. The magnitude estimation results of the first three seconds P wave indicate that, the estimation precision of combined method is higher than those of the two methods, the predominant period method and the peak amplitude method, and the saturation at great magnitude is improved.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2775-2780

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Nakamura: Proceedings of 9th WCEE, Vol. VII (1988), pp.673-678

Google Scholar

[2] M. Hoshiba, O. Kamigaichi, M. Saito, et al: EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 89(8) (2008), pp.73-80

DOI: 10.1029/2008eo080001

Google Scholar

[3] O. Kamigaichi, M. Saito, K. Doi, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 80(5) (2009), pp.717-726

Google Scholar

[4] Y. M. Wu, T. C. Shin, C. C. Chen, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 68(6) (1997), pp.931-943

Google Scholar

[5] Y. M. Wu, T. L. Teng: Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 92(5) (2002), pp.2008-2018

Google Scholar

[6] N. C. Hsiao, Y. M. Wu, T. C. Shin, et al: Geophysical Research Letters, 36 (2009), L00B02

Google Scholar

[7] J. M. Espinosa-Aranda, A. Jimenez, G. Ibarrola, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 66 (1995), pp.42-52

Google Scholar

[8] R. M. Allen, H. Kanamori: Science, 300 (2003), pp.786-789

Google Scholar

[9] G. Wurman, R. M. Allen, P. Lombard: Journal of Geophysical Research, 112 (2007), B08311

Google Scholar

[10] R. M. Allen, H. Brown, M. Hellweg, et al: Geophysical Research Letters, 36 (2009), L00B08

Google Scholar

[11] G. Cua, M. Fischer, T. Heaton, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 80(5) (2009), pp.740-747

Google Scholar

[12] F. Wenzel, M. C. Oncescu, M. Baur, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 70(2) (1999), pp.161-169

Google Scholar

[13] M. Böse, C. Ionescu, F. Wenzel: Seismological Research Letters, 34 (2007), L07302

Google Scholar

[14] E. Weber, V. Convertito, G. Iannaccone, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 78(6) (2007), pp.622-634

Google Scholar

[15] A. Zollo, G. Iannaccone, M. Lancieri, et al: Geophysical Research Letters, 36 (2009), L00B07

Google Scholar

[16] M. Erdik, Y. Fahjan, O. Ozel, et al: Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 1 (2003), pp.157-163.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1024813612271

Google Scholar

[17] K. Fleming, M. Picozzi, C.Milkereit, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 80(5) 2009, pp.755-771

Google Scholar

[18] T. Odaka, K. Ashiya, S. Tsukada, et al: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(1) 2003, pp.526-532

Google Scholar

[19] P. Rydelek, J. Pujol: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94 (2004), pp.1546-1550.

Google Scholar

[20] S. Horiuchi, H. Negishi, K. Abe, et al: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (2005), pp.708-718

Google Scholar

[21] H. Kanamori: Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 33 (2005), p.195–214

Google Scholar

[22] E. L.Olson, R. M. Allen: Nature, 438 (2005), pp.212-215

Google Scholar

[23] Y. M. Wu, H. Kanamori: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (2005), pp.347-353

Google Scholar

[24] Y. M. Wu, H. Kanamori: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (2005), pp.1181-1185

Google Scholar

[25] C. Satriano, A. Lomax, A. Zollo: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98 (2008), pp.1482-1494

DOI: 10.1785/0120060159

Google Scholar

[26] Y. M. Wu, L. Zhao: Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (2006), L16312

Google Scholar

[27] A. Zollo, M. Lancieri, and S. Nielsen: Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (2006), L23312.

Google Scholar

[28] C. F. Richter: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 25 (1935), pp.1-32

Google Scholar

[29] R. V. Allen: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 68 (1978), pp.1521-1532

Google Scholar

[30] H. Akaike: Second International Symposium on Information Theory, 1973, pp.267-281

Google Scholar