The Study on the Inhibiting Effect of Denitrifying Bacteria on Sulfate-Reducing Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The average concentration of H2S in Changqing oil Field is higher than 100mg/m3,which is much higher than the demand of “Operational Site Harm Factor Occupation Contact Limiting Value” (GBZ2-2002). Taking this factor into consideration, the experiment aimed at reducing H2S concentration in crude oil gatering and transferring systems by using the denitrifying bacteria. The experiment has two parts: First sulphat reduction process and then denitrification inhibit process. Therefore, two UASB reactors are used in a series to achieve these two processes. The first UASB reactor are mainly used to create SRB bacteria and H2S gas .After the first UASB reactor successfully starting, sodium nitrite are added in the second UASB to achieve denitrification inhibit process. The experiment showed that after the first UASB reactor start, the S2- can achieve 120mg/L and SO42- concentration is about 200 mg/L. So the Sulfate conversion rate can achieve 75%. Then, when the second UASB reactor started successfully, the S2- concentration sharply droped into 20 mg/L and SO42- concentration increased to 400mg/L, the sulphat reduction can achieve 83%. Also, advanced research showed that both SO42-concentration ratio and ORP value can contribute to restraining the SRB bacteria.Finally,through DGGE technology,many kinds of bacteria take into this process, for example pseudomonas aeruginosa. The results of this experiment has a great value to refrain the concentration of H2S in oil fields.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1210-1214

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Guangmin Liu, Zhaohan Zhang, Zhongxi Chen, et al. Continuous-flow Experiment of Denitrification Inhibiting Sulfate Reduction [J]. China Water and Wastewater, 2007, 23(5): 38-43.

Google Scholar

[2] Hongfang Liu, Meifang Wang, Liming Xu, et al. MICROBIOLOGIC CONTROL OF CORROSION CAUSED BY SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIA [J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2002, 23(12): 519- 522.

Google Scholar

[3] Jing Liu, Baoli Hou. Advances on Corrosion Caused by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria [J]. Materiais Protection, 2001, 34(8): 8-12.

Google Scholar

[4] JiaJun Li, Yumin Liu, Xiangwen Zhang, et al. Mechanism of metal corrosion caused by sulfate-reducing bacteria in the reinjection water in oilfields and its prevention and cure [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2007, 27(11): 4-7.

Google Scholar

[5] Li Luo, Yongjun Liu, Xiaochang Wang, et al. Distribution and Diversity of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in a Crude Oil Gathering and Transferring System [J]. Environmental Science, 2010, 31(9): 2159-2165.

Google Scholar

[6] Miao Li, Ping Guo, et al. The Harm of Sulfate Reducing Bacteria and Prevention [J]. Corrosion & Protection in Petrochemical Industry, 2007, 24(2): 49-52.

Google Scholar

[7] Tangbiao Wang, Pengkang Jin, Lihui Zhou , et al. Inhibiting function of denitrification in reducing the activities of sulfate bacteria in the crude oil refilling and transportation process [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment 2012, 12(1): 48-52.

Google Scholar

[8] Liing Jie, Dawei Di, et al. Reasearch On the Difference denitrification process between nitrite and nitrate [J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering,2009,35: 213-215.

Google Scholar

[9] Telang, A.J., Ebert S., Foght, J.M., et al. Effect of nitrate injection on the microbial community in an oil field as monitored by reverse sample genome probing[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1997, 63(5): 1785-1793.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.5.1785-1793.1997

Google Scholar

[10] Li Wei, Yanjun Wang , Fang Ma, Jianqi Zhang. Mechanism and application of denitrification inhibition to activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009, 41(4): 85-88.

Google Scholar