Batch Splitting Activity in Scheduling of Virtual Cell with Capacity Constraints Based on Bi-Level Mathematical Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

Although there has been some researches about virtual cell manufacturing system, the existing literature lack of discussion about the scheduling model that considering with bottleneck machines in the virtual cells. In view of this deficiency and the new characteristics of the batch splitting problem, this paper considered the batch splitting (or lot splitting) problem in scheduling of virtual manufacturing cells with bottlenecks and multiple machine types, and each of which has several identical machines. In consideration of the hierarchical decision structure of the problem, we developed a bi-level multi-objective mathematical model. Scheduling results and batch splitting strategies of both bottleneck and non-bottleneck machines are given in separate decision levels and additional scheduling objectives are improved in the second model level, while maintaining the maximum use of the bottleneck machine ability. In order to demonstrate how this approach works, application example was shown in this paper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1257-1264

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jiwu Mu in Chinese. Master's degree thesis of Huazhong university of science and technology, (2007)

Google Scholar

[2] Reiter, S. Journal of Business.Vol. 34(1966), p.371

Google Scholar

[3] Mohamad Y. Int. J. Production Economics. Vol. 124 (2010), p.32

Google Scholar

[4] Fantahun M. Defersha, Mingyuan Chen. International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 48(2010), p.1705

Google Scholar

[5] Quan-Ke Pan, P.N. Suganthan, J.J. Liangc, M. Fatih Tasgetiren. Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 38 (2011), p.3252

Google Scholar

[6] Quan-Ke Pan, Ruben Ruiz. Omega. Vol. 40 (2012), p.166

Google Scholar

[7] Chinyao Low, Chih-Ming Hsu, Kai -I Huang. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. Vol. 24(2004), p.773

Google Scholar

[8] Rahime Sancar Edis, Arslan Ornek. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory. Vol. 17 (2009), p.442

Google Scholar

[9] Taofeng Ye. Computers & Industrial Engineering. Vol. 62 (2012), p.1046

Google Scholar

[10] Inci Sarıçiçek, Cenk Çelik. Applied Mathematical Modeling. Vol. 35 (2011), p.4117

Google Scholar

[11] Suer GA, Saiz M, Gonzalez W. International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 36(1999), p.2185

Google Scholar

[12] Lockwood WT, Mahmoodi F, Ruben RA, Mosier CT. International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 38(2000), p.951

Google Scholar

[13] Defersha FM, Chen M. International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 103(2006), p.767

Google Scholar

[14] Ahkioon S, Bulgak AA, Bektas T. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol 192(2009), p.414

Google Scholar

[15] Saadettin Erhan Kesen and Zulal Gungor. International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 49(2011), p.1645

Google Scholar

[16] R. Kia, A. Baboli, N. Javadian, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, M. Kazemi, J. Khorrami. Computers and Operations Research (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2012.01.012

Google Scholar

[17] Colson, B., Marcotte, P., and Savard, G. A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research. Vol. 3 (2005), p.87

Google Scholar