Image Copy-Move Forgery Detection Based on SIFT and Gray Level

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to reduce the false matching rate when detecting copy-move forgeries, an improved method based on SIFT and gray level was proposed in this study. Firstly, extract SIFT key points, and establish SIFT feature vector for every key point; Secondly, extract the gray level feature and combine it with SIFT feature to found a feature vector with size of 129D; Finally, match the above feature vector between every two different key points and then the copy-move regions would be detected. The experimental results showed that the improved algorithm reduced false matching rate even when an image was distorted by Gaussian blur.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3021-3024

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhou Linna. Study of Digital Forensics Based on Image Content [D]. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] Hany Farid. Creating and Detecting Doctored and Virtual Images: Implications to the Child Pornography Prevention Act. Department of Computer Science, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] Jessica Fridrich, David Soukal, Jan Lukáš. Detection of Copy-Move Forgery in Digital Images. In Proceedings of Digital Forensic Research Workshop, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] Alin C. Popescu, Hany Farid. Exposing Digital Forgeries by Detecting Traces of Re-sampling. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol.53, No.2, (2005), pp.758-767.

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2004.839932

Google Scholar

[5] Weiqi Luo, Jiwu Huang, Guoping Qiu. Robust Detection of Region-Duplication Forgery in Digital Image. 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Vol.4, (2006), pp.746-749.

DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2006.1003

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang Ting, Wang Rang-ding. Copy-Move Forgery Detection based on SVD in Digital Image. 2nd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), (2009), pp.1-5.

DOI: 10.1109/cisp.2009.5301325

Google Scholar

[7] Huang Yanping, Lu Wei, Sun Wei, Long Dongyang. Improved DCT-based Detection of Copy-move Forgery in Images. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, Vol.206, No.1-3, (2011), pp.178-184.

DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.08.001

Google Scholar

[8] David G. Lowe. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, Vol.60, No.2, (2004), pp.91-110.

DOI: 10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94

Google Scholar

[9] Yan Ke1, Rahul Sukthankar. PCA-SIFT: a More Distinctive Representation for Local Image Descriptors. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, (2004), p.II-506 - II-513.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315206

Google Scholar

[10] Herbert Bay, Tinne Tuytelaars, Luc Van Gool. SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Vol.3951 LNCS, (2006), pp.404-417.

DOI: 10.1007/11744023_32

Google Scholar