Effects of Enzymes Treatment on Structure and Properties of Acellular Dermal Matrix

Article Preview

Abstract:

A porcine ADM was prepared by the means of combined treatments with alkali, enzymes, sodium lauryl sulfate (SDS) and NaCl solution. Concentration and process time of enzymes were varied respectively, and their effects on properties of ADM were evaluated, such as porosity, mechanical properties, enzymatic degradation. The composition of ADM was detected with an amino acid analyzer, and its microstructure was observed under SEM. To estimate its cytocompatibility, cells proliferation tests were performed by MTT assay, and cells distribution was viewed under CLSM. With increase of enzymes concentration and process time, the porosity of ADM was enhanced, but its ultimate tensile strength was weakened. And enzymatic process time affected the degradation rate of ADM in collagenase solution greatly. The obtained ADM framework had interconnected pores at about 100 μm in diameter. The MTT assay and CLSM image indicated that cells cultured on ADM proliferated well and distributed evenly. The prepared ADM has good microstructure, high mechanical properties, controlled enzymatic stability and good cell compatibility, and it has great potential use in the tissue engineering for further study.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

233-236

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Saddiq ZA, Barbene JCl, Grant MH. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2009, Vol. 89A(2009), p.697

Google Scholar

[2] O'Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, et al. Biomaterials, 26 (4) (2005), p.433

Google Scholar

[3] Tierney CM, Haugh MG, Liedl J, et al. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2(2) (2009), p.202

Google Scholar

[4] Yow SZ, Quek CH, Yim EKF, et al. Biomaterials, 30(2009), p.1133

Google Scholar

[5] Harley BA, Leung JH, Silva EC, et al. Acta Biomater, 3(4) (2007), p.463

Google Scholar

[6] Cornwel KG, Lei P, Andreadis ST, et al. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.A, 80A(2) (2006), p.362

Google Scholar

[7] Ng KW, Khor HL, Hutmacher DW, et al. Biomaterial, 25(17) (2004), p.2807

Google Scholar

[8] Tang Hongtai, Xiao Shichu, Xia Zhaofan, et al. Chinese Patent 1343523 (2002)

Google Scholar

[9] Liang HC, Chang Y, Hsu CK, et al. Biomaterials, 25(2004), p.3541

Google Scholar

[10] Ge Liangpeng, Zheng Shuquan, Wei Hong. Burns, 35(1) (2009), p.46

Google Scholar

[11] Hsu YY, Gresser JD, Trantolo DJ, et al. J Biomed. Mater. Res, 35(1997), p.107

Google Scholar

[12] Hu S.P., Zhao H.S., Wang G.C. et al. J.Shandong Univ (Eng.Sci.), 40(4) (2010), p.67

Google Scholar

[13] Powell HM, Boyce ST. Biomaterials, 27(2006), p.5821

Google Scholar

[14] Zhai Wanyin, Lü Xiqin, Chang Jiang, et al. Acta Biomaterialia, 6(2) (2010), p.389

Google Scholar

[15] Chen RN, Ho HO, Tsai YT, et al. Biomaterials, 25(2004), p.2679

Google Scholar

[16] Salih V, Georgiou G, Knowles JC, et al. Biomaterials, 22(2001), p.2817

Google Scholar

[17] Chen C., Wang Z. J., Liu W., et al. Chinese J. Aesth. Plas. Surg. 19(4) (2008), p.303

Google Scholar

[18] Liu C, Xia Z, Czernuszka JT. Chem. Eng. Rese.Design, 85(7) (2007), p.1051

Google Scholar

[19] Zhang G.A., Ning F.G., Zhong J.M.,et al. J.Clin.Rehab.Tissue Eng. Res., 11(41) (2007), p.8280

Google Scholar

[20] Ma Lie, Gao Changyou, Mao Zhengwei, et al. Biomaterials, 25(2004), p.2997

Google Scholar

[21] Jiang T.D.: Collagen and collagen protein (Chemical Industry Press, Chine 2006)

Google Scholar

[22] Koob TJ, Hernandez DJ. Biomaterials, 23(1) (2002), p.203

Google Scholar

[23] Xia J.G., Chen B., Yao S.Z. Chinese J. Chromatography, 26(5) (2008), p.295

Google Scholar

[24] Li Y., Wang C., Lan W.Q. Food Sci.Tech., 32(2007), p.137

Google Scholar