Patent Analysis on Graphene Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Article Preview

Abstract:

Graphene is one of the most promising new electrochemical materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) because of its superior electronic properties. In this work, we describe the patent map on graphene-based LIBs. We discuss the time-line for the amount of patent applications on LIBs, the nation and applicant distribution of the patent applications. We analysis the technology distribution in this field, which shows that applications about graphene-based cathode increase really fast. According to the analyse result, the Chinese patents have occupied the leading position in this new field but the applications are mostly submitted by colleges and research institutes, which suggests that few inventions have been implemented. In order to hold the market trends and improve competitiveness, it is necessary to keep eyes on worldwide patent application situations and build effective patent strategy, therefore, we also raise some advices and countermeasures about the graphene-based LIBs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

568-573

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Luo, S. Liu, and L. Zhi, Small Vol. 8 (2012), p.630

Google Scholar

[2] G. Zhou, Y. He, X. Yang, P. Gao, X. Liao, and Z. Ma, Progress in Chemistry, Vol. 24(2012), p.235

Google Scholar

[3] D. Chen, L. Tang, and J. Li, Chemical Society Reviews, Vol. 39 (2010), p.3157

Google Scholar

[4] G. Jo, M. CHoe, S. Lee, W. Park, Y. Kahng, and T. Lee, Nanotechnology, Vol. 23 (2012), p.112001

Google Scholar

[5] L. Biró, P. Nemes-Incze, and P. Lambin, Nanoscale, Vol. 4 (2012), p.1824

Google Scholar

[6] L. Zhi, Y. Fang, and F. Kang, New Carbon Materials, Vol. 26 (2011), pp.5-8

Google Scholar

[7] K. Novoselov, A. Geim, S. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. Dubonos, I. Grigorieva, and A. Firsov, Science, Vol. 306 (2004), p.666

DOI: 10.1126/science.1102896

Google Scholar

[8] T. Suzuki, T. Hasegawa, S. R. Mukai, and H. Tamon, Carbon, Vol. 41 (2003), p. (1933)

Google Scholar

[9] Arakawa Chem. Ind. Ltd., JP Patent 2,006,241,105. (2006)

Google Scholar

[10] T. Jin, W. Yuan, F. Wu, R. Liu, and B. Huang, CN Patent 101,414,760. (2009)

Google Scholar

[11] L. Fan, H. Tao, Y. Feng and L. Chen. CN Patent 101,937,985. (2010)

Google Scholar

[12] Q. Yang, W. Lv, Z. Zhou, W. Ni and X. Guo. CN Patent 101,982,408. (2010)

Google Scholar

[13] Q. Yang, W. Wei, F. Su, X. Chen and W. Lv. CN Patent 102,064,322. (2010)

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Zhao, C. Li and L. Pan. CN Patent 1,012,329. (2011)

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Wang, S. Chen, P Chen, J. Kan and H. Geng. CN Patent 102,324,497. (2011)

Google Scholar

[16] P. Liu. CN Patent 1,02,332,572.(2012)

Google Scholar

[17] J. Sun, C. Xu and L. Gao. CN Patent 102,324,522. (2012)

Google Scholar

[18] Applied. Sci. Inc and D. J. Burton. U.S. Patent 2,008,261,116. (2008)

Google Scholar

[19] B. Jiang and A. zhang, U.S. Patent 2,010,173,198. (2010)

Google Scholar

[20] Battelle Memoria. L. Inst, U.S. Patent 2,012,088,158. (2012)

Google Scholar

[21] Battelle Memoria. L. Inst, U.S. Patent 2,011,045,347. (2011)

Google Scholar

[22] Q. Yang, C. You, F. Su, and W. Lv. CN Patent 101,937,994. (2011)

Google Scholar

[23] F. Huang, S. Gong, and H. Liu. CN Patent 101,562,248. (2009)

Google Scholar

[24] M. Zhou, L. Zhong, J. Pan, and Y. Wang. CN Patent 102,468,485. (2012)

Google Scholar

[25] H. Liu. CN Patent 102,263,239. (2011)

Google Scholar

[26] Y. Yin, P. Wu, C. Cai, and H. Zhang. CN Patent 102,185,155. (2011)

Google Scholar

[27] Y. Yin, C. Cai, H. Zhang, and P. Wu. CN Patent 102,185,147. (2011)

Google Scholar

[28] H. Song, P. Guo, and X. Chen. CN Patent 101,728,535. (2010)

Google Scholar

[29] J. Ding. CN Patent 102,244,264. (2011)

Google Scholar