Seismic Vulnerability of Existing RC Buildings and Influence of the Decoupling of the Effective Masonry Panels from the Structural Frames

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present work we discuss on the seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete existing buildings. In particular we consider a reinforced concrete building originally designed for only gravitational loads and located in a zone recently defined at seismic risk. According to the Italian seismic code NTC 2008 a displacement based approach is adopted and the N2-method is considered for the nonlinear seismic analysis. In the analysis all the masonry infill panels in effective interaction with the structural frame are considered for the nonlinear modeling of the structure. The influence of the effective masonry infills on the seismic response of the structure is analyzed and it is discussed how the effect of the masonry infills irregularly located within the building can give rise to a worsening of the seismic performance of the structure. It is shown that in the present case a not uniform positioning of the masonry infills within the building can give rise to a fragile structural behavior in the collapse mechanism. Furthermore a comparative analysis is performed by considering both the structure with the effective masonry infills and the bare structural frame. For these two structures a pushover analysis is performed, the relative capacity curves are derived and it is shown that fragile collapse mechanisms can occur depending on the irregular positioning of the effective masonry infills. Accordingly it is discussed how in the present case a decoupling of the effective masonry infills from the structural frame can give rise to a smoother response of the capacity curves. For the examined case of an obsolete building with irregular positioning of the masonry panels, the choice of decoupling the effective masonry panels from the structural frame may facilitate the retrofitting strategies for the achievement of the proper safety factors at the examined limit states.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

646-655

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] NTC 2008, Decreto Ministeriale 14/01/2008, Nuove Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29 del 4 febbraio 2008 - Suppl. Ordinario n. 30, Roma, (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] Oliveto G., Decanini L.D., Repair and retrofit of a six storey reinforced concrete building damaged by the earthquake in south-east Sicily on the 13th December 1990, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp.57-71, (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(97)00014-6

Google Scholar

[3] Fajfar, P., Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, Issue 9, pp.979-993, (1999).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::aid-eqe850>3.0.co;2-1

Google Scholar

[4] Panagiotakos, T.B., Fardis M.N., Deformations of RC members at yielding and ultimate, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 98, Issue 2, pp.135-148, (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] FIB 2003, Fédération Internationale du Béton: Seismic Assessment and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, State-of-art report prepared by Task Group 7.1, FIB Bulletin n. 24, (2003).

DOI: 10.35789/fib.bull.0024.ch03

Google Scholar

[6] Paulay T., Priestley M.J.N., Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, Wiley Interscience, New York, (1992).

Google Scholar

[7] Dolsek M., Fajfar P., The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four – storey reinforced concrete frame – a deterministic assessment, Engineering Structures, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp.1991-2001, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.001

Google Scholar

[8] Panagiotakos T.B., Fardis M.N., Seismic response of infilled rc frames structures, Proceedings of 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No.225, Acapulco, (1996).

Google Scholar

[9] Panagiotakos T.B., Fardis M.N., Seismic design and response of bare and masonry-infilled reinforced concrete buildings. Part II: infilled structures, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol.1, n.3, pp.475-503, (1997).

DOI: 10.1080/13632469708962375

Google Scholar

[10] Cancellara, D., De Angelis, F., Pasquino, V., Displacement based approach for the seismic retrofitting of a RC existing building designed for only gravitational loads, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 166-169, pp.1718-1729, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.166-169.1718

Google Scholar

[11] De Angelis, F., An internal variable variational formulation of viscoplasticity, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 190, n. 1-2, pp.35-54, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00306-0

Google Scholar

[12] De Angelis, F., A variationally consistent formulation of nonlocal plasticity, Int. Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, Vol. 5, n. 2, pp.105-116, (2007).

DOI: 10.1615/intjmultcompeng.v5.i2.40

Google Scholar

[13] De Angelis, F., Multifield potentials and derivation of extremum principles in rate plasticity, Materials Science Forum, Vol. 539-543, pp.2625-2630, (2007).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.539-543.2625

Google Scholar

[14] De Angelis, F., On constitutive relations in non-smooth elasto/viscoplasticity, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 566, pp.691-698, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.566.691

Google Scholar

[15] De Angelis, F., Evolutive laws and constitutive relations in nonlocal viscoplasticity, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 152-154, pp.990-996, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.152-154.990

Google Scholar

[16] De Angelis, F., A comparative analysis of linear and nonlinear kinematic hardening rules in computational elastoplasticity, Technische Mechanik, Vol. 32, n. 2-5, pp.164-173, (2012).

Google Scholar

[17] De Angelis, F., Computational issues in rate dependent plasticity models, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 566, pp.70-77, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.566.70

Google Scholar

[18] De Angelis, F., Computational aspects in the elasto/viscoplastic material behavior of solids, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 567, pp.192-199, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.567.192

Google Scholar

[19] De Angelis, F., Numerical algorithms for J2 viscoplastic models, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 567, pp.267-274, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.567.267

Google Scholar

[20] De Angelis, F., Cancellara, D., Modano, M., Pasquino, M., The consequence of different loading rates in elasto/viscoplasticity, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 10, pp.2911-2916, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.483

Google Scholar

[21] De Angelis, F., Cancellara, D., Implications due to different loading programs in inelastic materials, Advanced Material Research, Vol. 422, pp.726-733, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.422.726

Google Scholar

[22] De Angelis, F., Cancellara, D., Results of distinct modes of loading procedures in the nonlinear inelastic behavior of solids, Advanced Material Research, Vol. 482-484, pp.1004-1011, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.482-484.1004

Google Scholar

[23] Stafford-Smith B., Behaviour of square infilled frames, Journal of the Structural Division, vol. 92, n.ST1, pp.381-403, (1966).

Google Scholar

[24] Bonardi, A., Influenza della modellazione strutturale sulla risposta sismica di edifici in cemento armato, (in italian), Università degli Studi di Brescia, Italy, (2004).

Google Scholar

[25] Mainstone R.J., On the stiffness and strength of infilled frames, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Supplement (IV), Paper n. 7360S, pp.57-89, (1971).

Google Scholar

[26] Mainstone R.J., Supplementary note on the stiffness and strength of infilled frames, Current Paper CP13/74, Building Research Establishment, London, (1974).

Google Scholar

[27] Cancellara, D., De Angelis, F., Steel braces in series with hysteretic dampers for reducing the seismic vulnerability of RC existing buildings: assessment and retrofitting with a non-linear model, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 204-208, pp.2677-2689, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.204-208.2677

Google Scholar

[28] Cancellara, D., De Angelis, A nonlinear analysis for the retrofitting of a RC existing building by increasing the cross sections of the columns and accounting for the influence of the confined concrete, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 204-208, pp.3604-3616, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.204-208.3604

Google Scholar