Restoring Force Models Investigation of Research Status and Problems Analysis of RC Structure

Article Preview

Abstract:

Restoring force model is a simplified mathematical model derived from restoring force-deformation curves in lots of tests. Selecting a reasonable restoring force model is the basis of conducting dynamic nonlinear analysis of structure. The work further investigates the advantage and disadvantage of the restoring force models presented in this paper. Classified and brief comments about the existing drawbacks of restoring force models and its application are conducted. Lastly, some useful suggestions are proposed for the further research.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1045-1048

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zixiong Guo, Yong Yang. State-of-the-art of restoring force models for RC structures. [J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2004,20(4):47-51 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Robert Park, Dudley Charles Kent, et al. Reinforced concrete members with cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE,1972,98(7):1341-1359.

DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0003267

Google Scholar

[3] Giorgio Monti, Camillo Nuti. Nonlinear cyclic behavior of reinforcing bars including buckling[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1992,118(12):3268-3285.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1992)118:12(3268)

Google Scholar

[4] L.L. Dodd, J.I. Restrepo-Posada. Model for predicting cyclic behavior of reinforcing steel[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1995,121(3):433-445.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1995)121:3(433)

Google Scholar

[5] Toader A. Balan, Filip C. Filippou, et al. Hysteretic model of ordinary and high-strength reinforcing steel[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998,124(3):228-296.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1998)124:3(288)

Google Scholar

[6] Matthew S. Hoehler, John F. Stanton. Simple phenomenological model for reinforcing steel under arbitrary load[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006,132(7):1061-1069.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:7(1061)

Google Scholar

[7] Kent D. c., and Park R. Flexural members with confined concrete [J]. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 1971, 97(7):1969-1990.

DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0002957

Google Scholar

[8] Sheikh S. A. and Uzumeri S.M. strength and ductility of tied concrete columns [J]. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 1980, 106(5):1079-1102.

DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0005416

Google Scholar

[9] Bolong Zhu and Wu M S. A study of hysteretic curve of reinforced concrete members under cyclic loading taking account of local contact effects of cracked section. [J]. Journal of Tongji University, 1980,(1):63-75 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Guo Z H, Zhang X Q. Cyclic loading test of the stress-strain curve of concrete. [A]. QingHuaDaXueKangZhenKangBaoGongChengYanJiuShiKeXueYanJiuBaoGaoJi,[C] Tsinghua University Press,1982.38-53.

Google Scholar

[11] Mander J B, Priestley M J N and park R. Theoretical stress-strain behavior of confined concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE,1988,114(8):1804-1826.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)

Google Scholar

[12] J. Hoshikuma, K. Kawashima, K. Nagaya, et al. Stress-strain model for confined reinforced concrete in bridge piers[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering. 1997,123(5):624-633.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1997)123:5(624)

Google Scholar

[13] Clough R W and Johnston S B. Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements[A]. Proc. 2th Japan Earth. Engng. Symp.[C]. 1966, Tokyo Japan.

Google Scholar

[14] Takeda T, Sozen M A and Nielson N N. Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes[J]. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 1970, 96(12): 2557-2572.

DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0002765

Google Scholar

[15] Takayanagi T and Schrobrich W C. Non-linear analysis of coupled wall systems[J]. Earth. Engrg. &Struc. Dynam, 1979, 7(1): 1-22.

Google Scholar

[16] Kabeyasawa T, Shioara H and Otani S. US-Japan cooperative research on RC full scale building test-Part 5: discussion on dynamic response system[A]. Proc. 8th WCEE[C], 1984, S. Francisco.

Google Scholar

[17] Saatcioglu M, Ozcebe G. Hysteretic behaviour of anchorage slip in RC members. [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1992, 118(9): 2439-2458.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1992)118:9(2439)

Google Scholar