Numerical Analysis of Composite Soil Nailing Retaining Wall under Earthquake

Article Preview

Abstract:

The seismic response of slope supported by composite soil nailing is analyzed by using finite element software ADNIA, in which the EL-Centro wave is selected as input earthquake wave.The analytical contents include the displacement and acceleration of supporting slope, as well as the time history responses of the axial forces of anchors. In the establishment of finite element model, the interaction between soil body and supporting structure is considered. The elastic-plastic M-C model with nonlinear static and dynamic behavior is used to simulate the soil body, and the dual linear strengthen model is adopted to simulate the supporting structure, then the interaction between soil body and supporting structure is simulated with contact element. The results show that the composite soil nailing slope supporting structure has better seismic performance than the general soil nailing slope supporting structure. The maximum horizontal displacement of the latter occurs at the slope top, but that of the former occurs at the slope upper. Especially after the imposition of the prestress, the slope displacement under earthquake reduces significantly, and the axial forces of anchors under earthquake enlarge significantly. Moreover, the axial forces of anchors reach maximum values near the slipping surface. The displacement and the acceleration of slope increase along the slope height. The conclusions obtained provide basis for the seismic design of permanent supporting slope and reference for similar projects.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1353-1358

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Alampalli, Sreenivas; Elgamal, Ahmed-W., In-situ dynamic testing of a cantilever retaining wall , Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference - IMAC SEM, 1997, 1(3): 120-126.

Google Scholar

[2] Koseki, J.; Munaf, Y.; Tatsuoka, F.; Tateyama, M.; Kojima, K.; Sato, T. , Shaking and tilt table tests of geosynthetic-reinforced soil and conventional-type retaining walls, Geosynthetics International, Industrial Fabrics Assoc Int, 1998, 5(1): 73-95.

DOI: 10.1680/gein.5.0115

Google Scholar

[3] Ramakrishnan, S.; Budhu, M.; Britto, A., Laboratory seismic tests on geotextile wrap-faced and geotextile-reinforced segmental retaining walls , Geosynthetics International, Industrial Fabrics Assoc Int, 1998, 5(1): 55-71.

DOI: 10.1680/gein.5.0114

Google Scholar

[4] Jianhua Dong; Yanpeng Zhu, Earthquake soil nailing highway slope parameter analysis[J]. Xi'an University of Architecture Technology University(Natural Science), 2007, 39(5): 661-666. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] Jianhua Dong; Yanpeng Zhu, The establishment of soil nailing soil system dynamics model and seismic response analysis[J]. Mechanics. 2009,41(2):236-242. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Jianhua Dong; Yanpeng Zhu, The seismic soil under nailing slope stability analysis[J]. China Journal of Highway, 2008, 21(6): 20-25. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] Jianhua Dong; Yanpeng Zhu, The seismic soil under nailing slope stability analysis J]. Vibration and Shock, 2009,28(3):119-124. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] Jianhua Dong; Yanpeng Zhu, Soil nailed slope earthquake dynamic analysis[J]. Chongqing Construction University Journal, 2008, 30(6): 90-95. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Jiahui Qian; Zongze Yin, The earthwork principle calculation (Second Edition)[M]. Beijing: China National Water Resources and Hydropower Press, 1996. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Roscoe K. H. and Bur land J. B. ,On the Generalized Stress-Strain Behavior of Wet Clay, Engineering Plastisity, ed. Heyman L and Leckie F. A., Cambridge Univ. Press. 1998, 5 (1): 23-45.

Google Scholar

[11] His J. P, Small c. Simulation of excavation in an elastic-plastic material and analysis method. Geomech, 1992, 16(1): 123-134.

Google Scholar