Fatigue Crack Propagation Prediction under Single Overload Variable Loading

Article Preview

Abstract:

Reasonably predicting the fatigue life of specimens, depends on the research and understanding of the fatigue crack propagation behavior under variable amplitude loading (VAL) rather than under constant amplitude loading (CAL). The present study aims at evaluating residual fatigue life under single overload VAL by adopting a dynamical coefficient mechanics (DCM) model which we have reported. New formulas connecting the crack length with number of cycles and expressions for the fatigue crack propagation (FCP) under single overload VAL have been derived and were used to predict crack propagation. The ratios of predicted-to-experimental lives range from 1.00 to 1.09, which indicates that the results obtained from this DCM model are in good agreement with experimental data from published literatures and cover all stages of fatigue crack growth curve.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

215-219

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Brock, Daved. Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2nd Edition, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague(1982).

Google Scholar

[2] R.A. Simith, J.F. Knott, N.A. Fleck, T.C. Lindley and K.J. Nix. In Fatigue Crack Growth: 30 Years of Progress, R.A. Smith Ed., Pergamon Press(1986).

Google Scholar

[3] W. Geary. A review of some aspects of fatigue crack growth under variable amplitude loading, Int J. Fatigue 14(6): 377-386(1992).

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(92)90225-2

Google Scholar

[4] J.B. Chang, C.M. Eds. Hudson. Method and Models For Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth under Random Loading. ASTM STP 748(1981).

DOI: 10.1520/stp748-eb

Google Scholar

[5] Zhifang Liu, Zhonyong Xu, Lixiong Gu, A novel mechanics model for fatigue crack growth under constant amplitude loading, The 11th International Symposium on Structure Engineering, V1: 886-890 (2010).

Google Scholar

[6] Lixiong Gu, Zhifang Liu, Zhongyong Xu. Threshold stress intensity factor () in inertial effect coefficient model. Advanced Materials Research, New and Advanced Materials, 197-198: 1452-1459(2011).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.197-198.1452

Google Scholar

[7] Lixiong Gu, Zhifang Liu, Zhongyong Xu. A key parameter in a novel fatigue crack growth model. Advanced Materials Research, Advances in Structures, 163-167: 3186-3192(2011).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.163-167.3186

Google Scholar

[8] Lixiong Gu, Zhifang Liu, Zhongyong Xu. Analysis of the parameter C in inertial effect coefficient model. Advanced Materials Research, Advances in Civil Engineering and Architecture, 243-249: 5458-5464(2011).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.243-249.5458

Google Scholar

[9] J.B. Chang, J.H. Stolpestad. Improved Methods For Predicting Spectrum Loading Effects-Phase I Report, Volume II Test Data(1979).

Google Scholar

[1013] D.Q. Xu. Analysis and research of basic assumptions of new fatigue crack propagation model[D]. China, Guangzhou, South China University of Technology(2009).

Google Scholar

[11] M. Shinozuka, R. Vaicaitis. Improved Methods For Predicting Spectrum Loading Effects-Phase I Report, Volume I-Results and Discussion(1979).

Google Scholar