Comparison of Two Hyperelastic Models for Carbon Black Filled Rubber

Article Preview

Abstract:

Mooney-Rivlin model and Ogden model are frequently used by engineers for finite element analysis of rubber material. Before simulation, simple, biaxial and planar extension tests are always done to get the model parameters. In this paper, we compare these two hyperelastic models with experimental data produced under simple, biaxial extension and planar extension loading conditions. The ability of the two models to reproduce different deformation modes is analyzed. Both material parameters and the stretch range of validity of each model are determined.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

28-32

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Johannknecht, St. Jerrams and G. Clauss: The Uncertainty of Implemented Curve Fitting Procedures in Finite Element Software, in Finite Element Analysis of Elastomers, edited by D. Boast and V.A. Convey, Professional Engineering Publishing, London(1999).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Kaliske and H. Rothert: Engineering Computations Vol. 14(1997), p.216.

Google Scholar

[3] M.C. Boyce and E.M. Arruda: Rubber Chemistry and Technology Vol. 73(2000), p.504.

Google Scholar

[4] L.R.G. Treloar: Trans. Faraday Soc Vol. 40(1944), p.59.

Google Scholar

[5] D.J. Seibert and N. Schöche: Rubber Chemistry and Technology Vol. 73(2000), p.366.

Google Scholar

[6] M.M. Attard and G.W. Hunt: Int. J. Solids Struct Vol. 41(2004), p.5327.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Marckmann and E. Verron: Rubber Chemistry and Technology Vol. 79(2006), p.835.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Steinmann, M. Hossain and G. Possart: Archive of Applied Mechanics Vol. 82(2012), p.1183.

Google Scholar

[9] M.J. Mooney: Journal of Applied Physics Vol. 11(1940), p.582.

Google Scholar

[10] R.W. Ogden: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Vol. 326(1972), p.565.

Google Scholar