The Influence of Void Orientation on Stress and Strain Fields for Nickel-Based Single Crystal Superalloys under Creep Loading

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fracture surface of crept nickel-based single crystal superalloy specimen shows that voids play significant role in creep rupture. In this study, the unit cell model containing two voids was established to study the influence of void orientation on the stress and strain distribution for nickel-based single crystal superalloy under creep loading with the creep constitutive relationship based on the crystal slip theory. Three cases were considered with different angle between the line connecting the centers of two voids and loading axis. The distributions of equivalent Mises stress, maximal resolved shear stress and equivalent creep strain have been given for different creep stages. The results show that the void orientation has remarkable influence on the void growth and the stress and strain distribution during creep.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

77-82

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.R. Rice and D.M. Tracey, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1969. 17: p.201.

Google Scholar

[2] A.L. Gurson, J. Engng. Mater. Technol, 1977. 99: p.2.

Google Scholar

[3] V. Tvergaard, Int. J. Fracture, 1982. 18: p.237.

Google Scholar

[4] K.L. Nielsen and V. Tvergaard, Int. J. Solids Structures, 2011. 48(9): p.1255.

Google Scholar

[5] K. S. Zhang, J.B. Bai and D. Francois, Int. J. Solids Structures, 1997. 36: p.3407.

Google Scholar

[6] M.J. Worswick and R.J. Pick, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1990. 38: p.601.

Google Scholar

[7] W. Brocks, D.Z. Sun and A. Honig, Int. J. Plasticity, 1995. 11: p.971.

Google Scholar

[8] G.P. Potirniche, J.L. Hearndon, M.F. Horstemeyer and X.W. Ling, Int. J. Plasticity 2006. 22: p.921.

Google Scholar

[9] T.L. Oregan, D.F. Quinn and M.A. Howe, Computational Mechanics, 1997. 20: p.115.

Google Scholar

[10] V.C. Orsini and M.A. Zikry, Int. J. Plasticity, 2000. 17: p.1393.

Google Scholar

[11] T. Schacht, N.U. and E. Steck, Int. J. Plasticity, 2003. 19: p.1605.

Google Scholar

[12] J.S. Wan, Z.F. Yue and Z.Z. Lu, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2005. 13(6): p.875.

Google Scholar

[13] Q.M. Yu, N.X. Hou and Z.F. Yue, Computational Materials Science, 2010. 48(3): p.597.

Google Scholar

[14] M.E. Kassner and T.A. Hayes, Int. J. Plasticity 2003. 19: p.1715.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Srivastava and A. Needleman, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2012. 20(3).

Google Scholar

[16] Q.M. Yu, Y.L. Wang, Z.X. Wen and Z.F. Yue, Materials Science and Engineering A, 2009. 520(1-2): p.1.

Google Scholar

[17] Z.Y. Yin, X.M. Cheng, Z.G. Yang and Z.F. Yue, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2001. 14(1): p.18.

Google Scholar

[18] MARC Analysis Research Corporation, MARC Volume D: User Subroutine and Special Routines, Version K7.

Google Scholar

[19] X. CHENG, Z. YIN and Z. CHEN. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2000. 22(3): p.197. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar