Virtual Prototype Design and Test-Simplifying the CAD/Analysis Interface

Abstract:

The design of mechanical structural parts is now predominantly a digital process. As an important element of the virtual design cycle, these parts must be tested for their structural integrity using finite element analysis (FEA) software. However, the interface between CAD and FEA is imperfect. The process of preparing CAD models for FEA consumes a great deal of the stress analyst’s time. Existing “automatic” CAD to FEA translators tend to treat all part features as “solid”; this leads to longer computation times and less accurate results for features that can be better characterized as “thin” or “long.” In addition, many features of CAD parts (e.g. fillets and chamfers) are important for their size and shape in the manufactured product, but have relatively little impact on the strength of the part and needlessly complicate the stress analysis—these features are usually removed by the analyst prior to FEA; they may need to be evaluated with additional analyses to test if it is safe to remove them. The Automatic CAD-FEA Interface Project (ACFI), is developing algorithms to make the translation from CAD to FEA seamless and automatic; these algorithms are based on mathematical theory and the principles of theoretical mechanics. This paper presents the latest ACFI advances for (i) automatically evaluating and reworking three dimensional CAD part geometries to prepare them for finite element meshing, (ii) exporting the revised geometries to a preprocessor, and (iii) identifying element type to be associated with each feature geometry. The algorithms used in this work approximate the medial axis transform (MAT) of the CAD part, a “power shape” that represents the three-dimensional solid part. This part can then be evaluated for its geometric properties. This approach has been shown to be a robust method for shape interrogation of three dimensional geometries.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 284-287)
• Pages: 3473-3476
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.284-287.3473
• Online since: January 2013
• Authors: Qiong Li, Carol A. Rubin
• Keywords: CAD, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Interface, MAT, Medial

References

[1] C.M. Hoffman: The Mathematics of Surfaces, Vol, IV, A. Bowyer (ed. ), Oxford University Press, (1994), p.421.

[2] T. Culver and D. Manocha: Solid Modeling, (1999), P. 179.

[3] D. Attali and A. Montanvert: Comput. Vis. Image Und., 67, 3 (1997).

[4] J.W. Brandt: Describing a Solid with the Three-Dimensional Skeleton, Proc. SPIE 1830: Conf. on Curves and Surfaces in Computer Vision and Graphics III, Nov; Boston, MA, (1992).

DOI: 10.1117/12.131752

[5] P. Hubbard: ACM T. Graphic. 15, 3 (1996).

[6] D. Sheehy, C. Armstrong and D. Robinson: Shape Description by Medial Axis Construction. IEEE T Vis Comput Gra, 2, 1 (1996).

[7] M. Teichman and S. Teller: Assisted Articulation of Closed Polygonal Models. Proc. 9TH Eurographics Workshop on Animation and Simulation, Aug; Lisbon, Portugal, (1998).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6375-7_7

[8] G.M. Turkiyyah, D.W. Storti, M. Ganter and M. Vimawala: Comput. Aided D. 29, 1, (1997).

[9] N. Amenta, M. Bern and M. Kamvysselis: A New Voronoi Based Surface Reconstruction Algorithm. Proc. SIGGRAPH , p.415, Aug; Orlando, FL, (1998).

DOI: 10.1145/280814.280947

[10] D. Attali, and J. -O. Lachaud: Comp Geom-Theor. Appl. 19, 2 (2001).

[11] C. Gold: Anti-Crust, "A One-Step Boundary and Skeleton Extraction Algorithm. Proc. 15th ACM Symp. On Computational Geometry, p.189, Jun; Miami, FL, (1999).

DOI: 10.1145/304893.304971

[12] N. Amenta, S. Choi, and R. Kolluri: The Power Crust. Proc. 6th ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and applications, p.249, (2001).

DOI: 10.1145/376957.376986