Improved Large Mass Method for Structural Base Excitation Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

To verify the precision and possible applicability of the large mass method (LMM) widely used in multiple-supported structures subjected to non-uniform base excitations, numerical simulations of a two-degrees-of-freedom (2-DOF) finite element model using the Rayleigh damping assumption are performed respectively according to the LMM and the relative motion method (RMM). Through comparisons with the RMM, the error origins and the applicability of the LMM are discussed. Then the improved LMM is presented herein based on the modification of ground motions considering the influences of Rayleigh damping coefficient α. It indicates that the LMM is not applicable to multi-support excitation analysis in the case of Rayleigh damping, which can cause significant errors. And the errors depend on the damping coefficient α. It’s also proved that the improved LMM is able to yield results that are identical to those of the RMM.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1588-1593

Citation:

Online since:

August 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Leger P, Ide I M, Paultre P. Multiple Support Seismic Analysis of Large Structures. Computers & Structures, Vol. 36 (6): 1153-1158(1990).

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(90)90224-p

Google Scholar

[2] Harichandran RS and Vanmarke EH. Stochastic Variation of Earthquake Ground Motion in Space and Time. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 112 (2): 154-174(1986).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1986)112:2(154)

Google Scholar

[3] Abrahamson NA. Empirical Spatial Coherency Functions for Application to Soil-structure Interaction Analyses. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 7 (1): 1-28 (1991).

DOI: 10.1193/1.1585610

Google Scholar

[4] Kiureghian AD. A Coherency Model for Spatially Varying Ground Motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 25 (1): 99-111(1996).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199601)25:1<99::aid-eqe540>3.0.co;2-c

Google Scholar

[5] Zerva A and Zervas V. Spatial Variation of Seismic Ground Motions: An Overview. Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 55(3): 271-296(2002).

DOI: 10.1115/1.1458013

Google Scholar

[6] Wenhua LIU,Qingshan YANG and Yuji TIAN. Response Analysis of National Stadium under Spatially Varying Earthquake Ground Motions. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, Vol. 47 (3): 261-270(2006).

Google Scholar

[7] Clough . Rw, Penzien. J: Dynamics of Structures (Mc Graw-Hill Inc., New York , 1975).

Google Scholar

[8] Wilson EL: Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis of Structures: A Physical Approach with Emphasis on Earthquake Engineering(Computers and Structures Inc., Berkley , 2000).

Google Scholar