The Effects of Methanol on Honehe Lignite Pyrolysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the pyrolysis of Honehe Lignite in N2 and N2-Methanol atmospheres were investigated on a fixed-bed reactor. The methanol flow rate, pressure, temperature and holding time were studied. The maximum of coal tar yields 12.01% (with methanol injected in) and 9.61% (absence of methanol) were achieved on the conditions of 520°C, 0.5MPa, N2 flow rate 50ml/min, methanol flow rate 0.1ml/min and holding time 20min, and the relative growing rate was about 25.0%. The gas from coal pyrolysis was detected by GC, and the coal tar was reprocessed and then detected by GC-MS. While the solid char was detected by IR to study the change of oxygen functional group during coal pyrolysis in N2-Methanol atmosphere. Compared with that pyrolysis in N2 atmosphere, the components, characteristics and properties of coal tar, gas and solid char varied a lot. The results showed that the injection of methanol into the system changed the products yields and distribution. The results showed that the total yields of phenol, cresol and xylenol (short for PCX) in the Acidic were about 1.93% and 1.15% (daf) in two atmospheres respectively, the PCX yields with methanol injected was about 1.67 times higher than that absence of methanol.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

748-754

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Koh Kidena*, Ryoko Adachi, Satoru Murata, Masakatsu Nomura. Fuel 87(2008) 388-394.

Google Scholar

[2] Kazuhiro Mae+, Shinji Inoue, Kouichi Miura*. Energy & Fuels 1996, 10, 364-370.

Google Scholar

[3] Jun-ichiro Hayashi. Eenergy & Fuels 1996, 10, 1099-1107.

Google Scholar

[4] Kouichi Miura, * Kazuhiro Mae+, Seiji Asaoka, Tomonori Yoshimura, and Kenji Hashimoto. Energy & Fuels 1991, 5.

Google Scholar

[5] Marcela Safarova*, Jaroslav Kusy, Lukas Andel. Fuel 84(2005) 2280-2285.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.05.015

Google Scholar

[6] J.P. Boudou, J. Bimer*, P.D. Salbut*, D. Cagniant+, R. Grubert+. Fuel Vol74 No. 6, pp.846-852, (1995).

DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(95)00018-z

Google Scholar

[7] Brain Strugnell, John W. Patrick*. Fuel Vol74 No. 4, pp.481-486, (1995).

Google Scholar

[8] Kouichi Miura*, Kazuhiro Mae, Akihiro Murata, Atushi Sato, Kiyoyasu Sakuvada, and Kenji Hashimoto. Energy & Fuels 1992, 6, 179-184.

Google Scholar

[9] Minura, K. etal. 1994, 20, (6) , 926-933.

Google Scholar

[10] L. Shen and D.K. Zhang*, H.M. Roach and Q.D. Nguyen. Dev. Chem. Eng. Mineral Process, 8(3/4), pp.293-309, (2000).

Google Scholar

[11] Ana M. Mastral*, Romon Murillo, Maria J, Perez-Suri and Marsiol Callen. Energy & Fuels 199610, 941-947.

Google Scholar

[12] Klavetter, E., Mithel, S.C.; R Garcia Snape, C. Elsevier September (1993).

Google Scholar

[13] Brain Strugnell, John W. Patrick*. Fuel Vol. 75, No. 3, pp.300-306, (1996).

Google Scholar

[14] Han Chen, Haiping Yang*, Fudong Ju, Jing Wang and Shihong Zhang. Asia-Pac.J. Chem. Eng. 2 007; 2: 203-212.

Google Scholar