An Organizational Social Responsibility Approach for Improving Mine Safety and Health in China

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper aims at presenting an organizational social responsibility approach for improving mine safety and health in China. Through an in-depth comparative analysis of the regulatory mechanisms for mine safety and health in USA and South Africa, it is found that the successful performance of mine safety and health in USA has been contributed by the triangle of effective law enforcement, advanced technology development and qualified labor training, and the impressive improvement of mine health and safety in South Africa has been attributed to the mechanism of tripartite engagement through the state, mine owners and employees. In view of findings from the US and South Africa experiences, an approach of organizational social responsibility through multi-stakeholders is proposed for China to fundamentally improve its performance of mine safety and health by adopting best practices.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2954-2962

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. A. Breslin, One hundred years of federal mining safety and health research (IC 9520). Pittsburgh, PA: NIOSH, (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] MSHA (Mine Safety and Health Administration), 25 Years of Success, http: /www. msha. gov/ MSHAInfo/25Years/MSHA%2025%20Years. pdf.

DOI: 10.4135/9781412963855.n781

Google Scholar

[3] A. Nieto and A. Duerksen, The effects of mine safety legislation on mining technology in the USA, International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering, Vol. 1, pp.95-103. ( 2008).

DOI: 10.1504/ijmme.2008.020473

Google Scholar

[4] M. Hermanus, The status of occupational health in the South African mining industry and key challenges for practitioners, Journal of the Mine Ventilation Society of South Africa, Vol. 59, pp.8-12. (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Li, C. Li, and S. Liu, Comparative and suggestive analysis of international mine safety and health standardization and regulation Systems, China Safety Science Journal, Vol. 19, pp.55-61 (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] C. Vintro, J. Comajuncosa, Corporate social responsibility in the mining industries: criteria and indicators. Dyna-Colombia, Vol. 77 , pp.31-41 (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Mutti, N. Yakovleva, D. Vazquez-Brust and M. H. Di Marco, Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Perspectives from stakeholder groups in Argentina. Resources Policy, Vol. 37, pp.212-222 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.05.001

Google Scholar

[8] B. Campbell, Corporate social responsibility and development in Africa: Redefining the roles and responsibilities of public and private actors in the mining sector. Resources Policy, Vol. 37, No 2, pp.138-143 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.05.002

Google Scholar

[9] A.B. Carroll, A.K. Buchholtz, Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. 5th ed. Australia: Thomson South-Western, (2003).

Google Scholar

[10] H. Jenkins, N. Yakovleva, Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, pp.271-284 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.10.004

Google Scholar

[11] D. Kemp, J. R. Owen, and S. Van De Graaff, Corporate social responsibility, mining and audit culture,. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 24, pp.1-10 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.002

Google Scholar

[12] A. A. de Waal, G. O. Escalante, Does the application of corporate social responsibility support a high performance organisation in achieving better results? The case of mining multinationals in Peru, International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, Vol. 3, pp.33-48 (2011).

DOI: 10.1504/ijssm.2011.040778

Google Scholar

[13] G. Hilson, Corporate Social Responsibility in the extractive industries: Experiences from developing countries, Resources Policy, Vol. 37, pp.131-137 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.01.002

Google Scholar