Study of Effect of Ternary-Component Blended Coal on Coal Gasification Reaction at High Temperature

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three typical Chinese individual coals which existed remarkable difference on coal ash chemical composition and ash fusion temperature were selected to carry out coal blending experiments to study the coal gasification reaction at high temperature by means of using ternary-component blended coal technique and TGA-DTA method. According to ternary-component blended coal with a certain proportion, ash chemical composition and coal-char/CO2 gasification reactivity were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and thermogravimetric analysis-derivative thermogravimetric analysis (TGA-DTG), respectively. The results show that the ash chemical components change because ternary-component blended coals change the mineral composition, and hence, the gasification reactivity can be affected as well. Moreover, in accordance with reactivity index R, it indicates that the order of gasification reactivity of three individual coals and four blended coal options is coal x > option B > option A > option D > option C > coal z >coal y. Meanwhile, a new mathematical model called per unit ash alkali index B* was established by using the ash chemical component dates, which has a good corresponding relationship with R for four blending coal options. Utilizing ternary-component blended coal technique could improve the high-temperature coal ash gasification reaction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3104-3109

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Xiaojiang Wu, Zhongxiao Zhang, Xueyuan Xu, Jianwen Zhang, Jianbin Liu, Gongquan Liu, Tuo Zhou, Yushuang Chen. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics 2011, 32(8), 1425-1429 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Stiegel GJ, Maxwell RC. Fuel Process Technology 2001, 71, 79-97.

Google Scholar

[3] Ja´nos M. Beer´. Progress in Energy Combustion Science 2007, 33, 107-134.

Google Scholar

[4] Jin Bai, Wen Li, Baoqing Li. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 2006, 34(3), 292-297 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Ratale H. Matjie, David French, Colin R. Ward, Petrus C. Pistorius, Zhongsheng Li. Fuel Processing Technology 2011, 92(8), 1426-1433.

Google Scholar

[6] Jerzy Tomeczek, Henryk Palugniok. Fuel 2002, 81(10), 1251-1258.

Google Scholar

[7] Yushuang Chen, Zhongxiao Zhang, Xiaojiang Wu, Xiaojiang Wu, Jie Li, Rouging Guan, Bo Yan. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 2009, 37(5), 521-526 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Lijian Yu, Zhenyu Huang, Jun Cheng, Huayin Pan, Junhu Zhou, Kefa Cen. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 2009, 37(2), 139-144 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Jianguo Yang, Zhi Liu, Hong Zhao, Kefa Cen. Proceedings of the CSEE 2008, 28(14), 61-66 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Kechang Xie. Coal structure and its reactivity (Science Press, Beijing 2002).

Google Scholar

[11] Walker PL, Austin LG. Advances in Catalysis (Academic Press, NY 1959).

Google Scholar

[12] Sakawa M, Sakurai Y, Hara Y. Fuel 1982, 61(8), 717-720.

Google Scholar

[13] Shike Xue, Chunde Xie, Yanli Ma. Clean Coal Technology 2010, 16(2), 59-61 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Takarada T, Tammai Y, Tomitta A. Fuel 1985, 64(10), 1438-1442.

Google Scholar