A Methodology for Systematic Geometric Error Compensation in Integrated Inspection and Machining

Abstract:

Evaluation of form errors of machined parts is fundamental in quality inspection to verify their conformance to the expected tolerances. Performance of methods have been reviewed in [1].A methodology for maximizing the adherence to the specified tolerances using an integrated machining and inspection system is presented. Considering thedesired tolerance envelope of the part, an error decomposition technique is developed to model machining errors caused by the systematic and non-systematic errors in the machine tool. The model is used to adaptively plan the final machining cuts, based on inspection feedback, to enhance the geometric accuracy of the final product and is illustrated by an example.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 302)
• Pages: 535-540
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.302.535
• Online since: February 2013
• Authors: Yong Jun Jiang
• Keywords: Conformance, Methodology, Systematic, Tolerance

References

[1] G. Moroni, S. Petro Geometric tolerance evaluation: a discussion on minimum zone fitting algorithms Precision Engineering, 0141-6359, 32 (July (3) (2008), p.232–237.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2007.08.007

[2] Donmez, A, 1985, A General Methodology for Machine Tool Accuracy Enhancement -Theory, Application and Implementation, PhD Dissertation, Purdue University.

[3] Yamazaki, K. Hanaki, Y. Moro, M. Tezuka, K., 1998, Autonomous Coordinate Measurement Planning with Work-In-Progress Measurement for TRUE-CNC, Annals of CIRP, 47/1: 445-448.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62873-x

[4] Wilhelm R. G., Srinivasan，1997, Part Form Errors Predicted from Machine Tool Performance Measurement, Annals of CIRP.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60868-3

[5] Hocken, R. J, 1980, Technology of Machine Tools, Vol. 5: Machine Tool Accuracy, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory report, n. UCRL -52960-5, l-85.

[6] Lin, Y., Shen, Y., 1999, Generic kinematic Error Modeling for Machine Tool Metrology, International Journal of Flexible Automation and Integrated Manufacturing, 7(3&4): 305-220.

[7] ASME Y14. 5. 1 M, 1999, Mathematical Definition of Dimensioning and Tolerancing Principles, Reaffirmed, The American Society of Mechanical Engineering.

[8] Nassef, A. O., EIMaraghy, H. A, 1999, Determination of Best Objective Function for Evaluating Geometric Deviations, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1590-95.

DOI: 10.1007/s001700050044

[9] Lagarias, J.C., Reeds, J. A, Wright, M. H., Wright P.E., 1998, Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions, Society ofInternational Applied Mathematics, 9/1: 112-147.

DOI: 10.1137/s1052623496303470