Study on Corrosion Behavior of Hot Dip Coatings in Wet-Dry Cyclic Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

The corrosion of fasteners in ballast tank is much serious, due to the wet-dry corrosive conditions. Now most fasteners are protected by zinc-aluminium coating. In order to evaluate the anticorrosion performance of hot dip Galvanized (GI), Galfan (GF) and Galvalume (GL) coated fasteners in wet-dry cyclic conditions, the corrosion behavior of these coatings in 1h wet and 7h drying condition were investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy technology. The corrosion rate of GI coating in drying condition is much faster than that in wet condition before 23rd cycle, after that time the corrosion rate in sea water is faster than that in drying condition, however the corrosion rate of GF coatings in drying condition is much slower than that in wet condition, and for GL coating, the polarization resistance is both than 104Ω•cm2, whether it is immersed in seawater or in drying condition, which suggests it has better anticorrosion performance. The corrosion rate of the GI, GF and GL coating is 30µm per year, 1.5µm per year and 1.3µm per year respectively and corrosion resistance of GL and GF is therefore twenty two and twenty times as that of GI.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2545-2551

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Pang T, Xia S C. Electric power fittings, 1 (2009) 83-86. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Wang S M, He M Y, Liu L, Zhu X J. Hardware science and technology, 1 (2006) 45-49. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Guan H B. Information technology, 5 (2006) 52. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Yadav A, Nishikata A, Tsuru T. Corrosion Science, 46 (2004) 169-181.

Google Scholar

[5] Wang Y H, Zhang T, Wang J, Wang F H.Journal of Chinese society for corrosion and protection, 2 (2004) 459-64.

Google Scholar

[6] Kamimura T, Stratmann M, Corrosion Science, 43 (2001) 429-447.

Google Scholar

[7] Mahdy G, Kwang. Electrochimica Acta, 49 (2004) 1937-(1948).

Google Scholar

[8] Nishikata A, Yamashita Y, Katayama H, Tsuru T, Usami A, Tanabe K, Mabuchi H.Corrosion Science, 37 (1995) 2059-(2069).

DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(95)00104-r

Google Scholar

[9] Mahdy G, Nishikata A, Tsuru T.Corrosion Science, 42 (2000) 183-194.

Google Scholar

[10] Yadav A, Nishikata A, Tsuru T.Corrosion Science, 46 (2004) 361-376.

Google Scholar

[11] Mahdy G, Nishikata A, Tsuru T.Corrosion Science, 42 (2004) 1509-1521.

Google Scholar

[12] Fu A Q, Xing S H, Zhang S T, Li Y.Corrosion science and protection technology, 19 (2007) 243-246. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Stramann M, Streckel H. Corrosion science, 30 (1990) 697.

Google Scholar

[14] Wang J, Tsuru T.Journal of Chinese society for corrosion and protection, 15 (1995) 180-188. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Xing S H, Li Y, Wu J H, Yan Y G.Materials and Corrosion, 61 (2010) 428-431. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] Yadav A, Suzukif F, Nishikata A, Tsuru T.Electrochimica acta, 49 (2004) 2725-2729. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[17] Xing S H.Master Thesis, Chongqing University, 2005 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[18] Li Y, Xing S H, Li X, Wei X J. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 17 (2007) 1527-1535. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[19] Li Y, Xing S H, Li X, Wei X J. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 17 (2007) 1247-1254. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar