Effect of DC Supply Voltage on Eddy Current Loss in Permanent Magnet of Permanent Magnetic Synchronous Motor for Electric Vehicle Application

Article Preview

Abstract:

The 2-D time-stepping finite element method is adopted to systematically analyze the effect of DC supply voltage of inverter on eddy current loss in permanent magnet of PMSM for EV application. The finite element model and inverter model are built to calculate the winding currents, eddy current losses in permanent magnet and air-gap flux densities with different DC supply voltages when the motor runs in flux-weakening area. Analysis shows that, the eddy current increases significantly with the increase of DC supply voltage, although the fundamental winding current decreases. The temperature-rise experiment of permanent magnet is carried out, proving the validity of analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

262-265

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] I. Takahashi, T. Koganezawa, G. J. Su. A Super Higher Speed PM Motor Drive System by a Quasi-current Source Inverter. IEEE Trans. Ind Appl. 1994, 30(3): 683-690

DOI: 10.1109/28.293717

Google Scholar

[2] Dai Wenjing, Design of Electric Machine Macmillan, Beijing, 2010.

Google Scholar

[3] Shen Qiping. Study on High Power Density Permanent Magnet Synchronous [4]. Motor For Electric Vehicles Appliactian.[D], 2012.5

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang, Hongliang. Iron Losses and Transient Temperature Field of Permanent Magnetic Synchronous Motor. D. 2010: 6

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Kawase, T. Ota, H. Fukunaga. 3-D Eddy Current Analysis in Permanet Magnet of Interrior Permanent Motors. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2000,36(4): 1863-1866

DOI: 10.1109/20.877808

Google Scholar

[6] D. Ishak, Z. Q. Zhu, D. Howe. Eddy-current Loss in the Rotor Magnets of Permanent-magnet Brucshless Machines Having a Fractional Number of Slots Per Pole. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2005, 41(9):2462-2469.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2005.854337

Google Scholar