Computation of Gas Hydrate Saturation Models Based on the Experimental Acoustic Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is necessary to know gas hydrate saturation in evaluating gas hydrate volume. So far, there are only few models to estimate gas hydrate saturation. These models are often empirical or derived from observed data. Therefore, we need to confirm their legitimacy and get an approach to use the correct model. For the first time, we combine Ultrasonic Wave and Time Domain Reflectometry to study the relationship between gas hydrate saturation and acoustic parameters, which gets fine results. Subsequently, it attempts to compare the calculated data by time-average equation, Wood’s equation, Lee’s weighted equation and BGTL with the observed data in experiments. The results show the experimental method is very effective. It suggests that the Lee’s weighted equation and BGTL are more applicable in our experiments and various sediments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

714-717

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ruan Aiguo, Li Jiabiao, Chu Fengyou, et al. AVO numerical simulation of gas hydrates reflectors beneath seafloor. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 2006, 49(6):1826~1835.

DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.994

Google Scholar

[2] Hyndman R D, Spence G D. A seismic study of methane hydrate marine bottom simulating reflectors. J. Geophys. Res., 1992, 97:6683~6698.

DOI: 10.1029/92jb00234

Google Scholar

[3] Wyllie M R J, Gregory, and Gardner G H F. An experimental investigation of factors affecting elastic wave velocities in porous media. Geophysics, 1958, 23:459~493.

DOI: 10.1190/1.1438493

Google Scholar

[4] Pearson C F, Halleck P M, McGulre P L, et al. Natural gas hydrate; A review of in situ properties. J. Phys. Chem., 1983, 87:4180~4185.

DOI: 10.1021/j100244a041

Google Scholar

[5] Nobes D C, Villinger H, Davis F F, et al. Estimation of marine sediment bulk physical properties at depth from seafloor geophysical measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 1986, 91: 14033~14043.

DOI: 10.1029/jb091ib14p14033

Google Scholar

[6] Lee M W, Hutchinson D R, Collett T S, et al. Seismic velocities for hydrate-bearing sediments using weighted equation. J. Geophys. Res., 1996, 101:20347~20359.

DOI: 10.1029/96jb01886

Google Scholar

[7] Biot M A. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J. Appl. Phys., 1941, 12: 155~164.

Google Scholar

[8] Gassmann F. Elasticity of porous media, Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesselschaft, 1951, 96:1~23

Google Scholar

[9] Lee M W. Modified Biot-Gassmann theory for calculating elastic velocities for unconsolidated and consolidated sediments. Marine Geophysical Researches, 2002, 23:403~412.

DOI: 10.1023/b:mari.0000018195.75858.12

Google Scholar

[10] Zillmer M. A method for determining gas- hydrate or free-gas saturation of porous media from seismic measurements. Geophysics, 2006, 71:21~32.

DOI: 10.1190/1.2192910

Google Scholar

[11] Helgerud M B, Dvorkin J, Nur A, et al. Elastic-wave velocity in marine sediments with gas hydrate: Effective medium modeling. Geophysical Research Letters, 1999, 26:2021~2024.

DOI: 10.1029/1999gl900421

Google Scholar

[12] Winters W J, Waite W F, Mason D H, et al. Sediment properties associated with gas hydrate formation. 4th International Conference on Gas Hydrate, 2002, 722~727.

Google Scholar

[13] Winters W J, Waite W F, Mason D H, et al. Methane gas hydrate effect on sediment acoustic and strength properties. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2007, 56:127~135.

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2006.02.003

Google Scholar

[14] Yun T. S., Francisca F. M., Santamarina J. C., et al. Compressional and shear wave velocities in uncemented sediment containing gas hydrate. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32, L10609:1~5.

DOI: 10.1029/2005GL022607

Google Scholar

[15] Yun T S, Narsilio G A, Santamarina J C, et al. Instrumented pressure testing chamber for characterizing sediment cores recovered at in situ hydrastatic pressure. Marine Geology, 2006, 229:285~293.

DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2006.03.012

Google Scholar

[16] Yang J, Llamedo M, Marinakis D, et al. Successful application of a versatile ultrasonic test system for gas hydrates in unconsolidated sediments. 5th International Conference on Gas Hydrate, Trondheim, Norway, 2005, 340~346.

Google Scholar

[17] Zhao Qun, Guo Jian, Hao Shouling, et al. Experiments of physical modeling for petrophysical properties of natural gas hydrate. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 2005, 48(3):649~654.

DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.705

Google Scholar

[18] Spangenberg E, Kulenkampff J. Physical properties of gas hydrate-bearing sediments. 5th International Conference on Gas Hydrate, Trondheim, Norway, 2005, 587~596.

Google Scholar

[19] Priest J, Best A, Clayton C, et al. Seismic properties of methane gas hydrate-bearing sand. 5th International Conference on Gas Hydrate, Trondheim, Norway, 2005, 440~447.

DOI: 10.1029/2004jb003259

Google Scholar

[20] Ye Yuguang, Zhang Jian, Diao Shaobo, et al. Geophysical simulating apparatus for gas hydrate detection. Chinese Patent: CN200410036544.X, 2004, p.10.

Google Scholar

[21] Li Yalin, He Zhenhua, Huang Deji, et al. Relation between rock porosity-permeability property and seismic wave attenuation and propagation velocity (in Chinese). Natural gas industry, 2001, 21(4): 7~11.

Google Scholar

[22] Sun Chunyan, Zhang Mingyu, Niu Binghua, et al. Micromodels of gas hydrate and their velocity estimation methods (in Chinese). Earth Science Frontiers (China University of Geosciences, Beijing), 2003, (10):191~198.

Google Scholar