Investigating the Capability of Acoustic Emission Technology to Determine Slug Velocity in Gas/Water Two Phase Flow in Horizontal Pipes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Two phase flow is a common phenomenon that exists in the petroleum and chemical engineering industrial fields. An important feature employed to describe two phase flow is the flow regime which varies depending on the individual velocities of the components within the two-phase flow. One of these regimes, the slug regime, can create significant pressure fluctuations that compromise the integrity of the transporting structure (pipes, separators, etc). This is in addition to other unwanted effects such as flooding at the receiving end, an increase in deposits of hydrates and corrosion. Under such circumstances the detection of the slug and its associated characteristics are vitally important to the operator. This experimental study looks into the application of Acoustic Emission (AE) technology for detecting slug velocity in two phase (gas/liquid) flow. It is verified that slug velocity can be determined by using acoustic emission sensors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

545-551

Citation:

Online since:

April 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Taitel Y, Dukler AE. A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas_liquid flow. AIChE Journal 1976; 22: 47_55.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690220105

Google Scholar

[2] Nydal O J, Pintus S, Andreussi P. Statistical characterization of slug flow in horizontal pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 1992; 18: 439_53.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(92)90027-e

Google Scholar

[3] Emerson d R, Leonardo G J. A non-intrusive probe for bubble profile and velocity measurement in horizontal slug flows. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 2005; 16: 229-39.

DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2005.03.003

Google Scholar

[4] Gu H, Gue L. Experimental investigation of slug development on horizontal two-phase flow. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 2008; 16: 171-77.

DOI: 10.1016/s1004-9541(08)60058-0

Google Scholar

[5] Fusheng Z, Feng D. A measurement method of slug flow velocity of gas-liquid two-phase flow in horizontal pipe. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf (I2MTC), IEEE (3-6 May 2010): 250 - 54.

DOI: 10.1109/imtc.2010.5488229

Google Scholar

[6] British S. Nondestructive testing – terminology, Part 9: Terms used in acoustic emission testing 2000(BS EN 1330-9: 2000).

Google Scholar

[7] Muravin D B. Acoustic emissions science and technology 2009; Available at: www. muravin. com. Accessed June/15.

Google Scholar

[8] Hellier C. 2001 Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation (New york ; London: McGraw-Hill).

Google Scholar

[9] Holroyd T J. 2000 The Acoustic Emission & Ultrasonic Monitoring Handbook (Oxford: Coxmoor).

Google Scholar

[10] Yen G G, Lu H. Acoustic emission data assisted process monitoring. ISA Trans 2002 Jul; 41: 273- 82.

DOI: 10.1016/s0019-0578(07)60087-1

Google Scholar

[11] Albion K, Briens L, Briens C and Berruti F. Flow regime determination in horizontal pneumatic transport of fine powders using non-intrusive acoustic probes. Powder Technology 2007; 172: 157-66.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2006.10.040

Google Scholar

[12] Addali A. 2010 Monitoring gas void fraction in two-phase flow with acoustic emission Cranfield University Library: Cranfield University.

Google Scholar

[13] Shuib H, Addali A, Mba D. 2010 Observation of Acoustic Emission from Bubble Inception and Collapse Pro of The World Congress on Engineering (London, UK. 30 June - 2 July (2010).

Google Scholar

[14] Connor T. http: /www. drtomoconnor. com/3760/3760lect03. htm. July 17, 2011; Accessed November 25, (2011).

Google Scholar