The Complexity Evaluation Method of Electromagnetic Environment Based on Statistical Characteristics Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

An objective complexity evaluation method of electromagnetic environment is presented based on statistical characteristics analysis. In order to quantize variation characteristics and statistical law of electromagnetic environment, evaluation factors are introduced such as relative variation, average variational ratio, maximum variational ratio, standard deviation and skewness of power spectral density. Besides, evaluation factors such as time occupancy, spectrum occupancy, space occupancy and Average energy value are utilized to conduct the objective evaluation comprehensively and accurately in time, frequency, space and energy domains. The practicability of this method is validated by monitoring data. Results show that this method can effectively evaluate the complexity of electromagnetic environment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

779-784

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kesheng Zhou ,Xiaohui Luo andYang Zhang: Synthetical Evaluation of Complexity of Battlefield Electromagnetic Environment, Ship Electronic Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 6 (2009), pp.43-46. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] Xiaoming Luo: Study of the Complexity Evaluation Method of Battlefield Electromagnetic Environment Based on Catastrophe Theory, Journal of the Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, , Vol. 20, No. 1 (2009), pp.7-11. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Youlin Gu, Zhi Zhang, Wei Wang, Shengliang Fang and Tao Shao: Research and Simulation Implementation of Electromagnetic Environment Complex Evaluation Algorithm, Journal of System Simulation, Vol. 24, No. 2 (2012), pp.394-403. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Xiaomao Xu, Dianfa Ping, Dan Zhang and Peihong Zhao: submitted to Journal of Electronic Measurement Technology, Vol. 32, No. 6 (2009), pp.77-80. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] Hangyong Chen, Dianzong Zhang, Yi Wang and Changda Xiao: submitted to Journal of Electronic Information Warfare Technology, Vol. 25, No. 2 (2010), pp.74-83. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Xiaoming Luo, Huaqiao Min and Di Yang: submitted to Journal of the Academy of Equipment Command& Technology, Vol. 19, No. 6 (2008), pp.6-10. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] Jin Zhao, Ding Hong and Li Dong: submitted to Journal of Fire Control & Command Control, Vol. 36, No. 12 (2011), pp.194-197. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] Hepeng Dai and Donglin Su: submitted to Journal of Microwave, Vol. 25, No. 3 (2009), pp.25-27. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Shuai Liu, Zhi Li, and Shaolong Zeng: submitted to Journal of Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, Vol. 22, No. 5 (2011), pp.93-96. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Lihu Chen and Eryang Zhang: submitted to Journal of Electronic Warfare, Vol. 125, No. 2 (2009), pp.6-8. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] Ziwei Chen and Huadong Chen: submitted to Journal of Command Control & Simulation, Vol. 31, No. 4 (2009), pp.56-59. In Chinese.

Google Scholar