Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Customised Tibia Bone Scaffold

Article Preview

Abstract:

The function of Tissue Engineering Bone Scaffold lies in Mechanical and Fluid dynamic behaviour to mimic the exact bone tissue. The fluid dynamic characteristic in a porous scaffold plays a vital role for cell viability and tissue regeneration. The Wall Shear Stress of fluid in a porous scaffold gives the cell proliferation. This paper presents, the patients CT scan data in DICOM format is exported into MIMICS software to convert the 2D images into 3D IGES data. The customised bone scaffolds with pore size of 0.6mm in diameter and distance between adjacent edges of pores from 0.6mm to 1mm are created in modeling software (SOLIDWORKS 2011) and porosities of five customised bone scaffolds are determined. The above customised bone scaffolds are analysed in CFD software (ANSYS CFX) for the fluid density 1000 kg/m3 and viscosity 8.2 ×10-4 kgm-1 s-1. The estimated Wall Shear Stress (WSS) at fluid velocities from 0.2mm/s to 1mm/s lies in the range of 9.54 x 10 -4 Pa to 38.3 x 10 -4 Pa.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

698-702

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Tan, K.H., Chua, C.K., Leong, K.F., Cheah, C.M.," Scaffold development using selective laser sintering polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite biocomposite blends". Biomaterials 26, 4281–4289 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00131-5

Google Scholar

[2] Mikos AG et al. "Prevascularization of porous biodegradable polymers"Bio-technology Bio-eng 1993; 42 (6):716–23.

Google Scholar

[3] Bruder SP et al. "The effect of implants loaded with autologous mesenchymal stem cells on the healing of canine segmental bone defects". J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80(7):985–96

DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199807000-00007

Google Scholar

[4] Yang, S.F., Leong, K.F., Du, Z.H., Chua, C.K. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue Engineering" Part 1-Traditional factors. Tissue Eng. 7(6), 679–690 (2001)

DOI: 10.1089/107632701753337645

Google Scholar

[5] Chua CK, Leong KF, Cheah CM, Chua SW. Development of a tissue engineering scaffold structure library for rapid prototyping. Part 1: investigation and classification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2003;21:291–301

DOI: 10.1007/s001700300034

Google Scholar

[6] Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M, Risbud MV. Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems.Trends Biotechnol 2004; 22 (7):354–62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.05.005

Google Scholar

[7] Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 2005;4:518–24.

Google Scholar

[8] Martin I, Wendt D, Heberer M. The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 2004; 22:80–6.

Google Scholar

[9] Porter B, Zauel R, Stockman H, Guldberg R, Fyhrie D. 3-D computational modeling of media flow of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. J Biomech 005; 38:543–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.04.011

Google Scholar

[10] Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000; 21:2529–43.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6

Google Scholar

[11] Reich KM, Frangos JA. Effect of flow on prostaglandin E2 and inositol triphosphate levels in osteoblasts. Am J Physiol 1991;261:428–32.

Google Scholar

[12] Davisson, T., Sah, R.L., Ratcliffe, A., 2002.Perfusion increases cell content and matrix synthesis in chondrocyte three-dimensional cultures. Tissue Engineering 8,807-816.

DOI: 10.1089/10763270260424169

Google Scholar

[13] McMahon, L.A., Reid, A.J., Campbell, V.A., Prendergast, P.J., 2008.Regulatory effects of mechanical strain on the chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs in a collagen-CAG scaffold: experimental and computational analysis. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 36(2), 185-194.

DOI: 10.1007/s10439-007-9416-5

Google Scholar

[14] Singh H., Teoh S.H., Low H.T., Hutmacher D.W., 2005, Flow modelling within a scaffold under the influence of uniaxial and biaxial bioreactor rotation, J.Biotechnology, 119 (2): 181196.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.03.021

Google Scholar