Feedback Ranking Method in Topic-Based Retrieval

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ranking has an extensive application in analyzing public opinions of social network (SN), such as searching the most hot topic or the most relevant articles that the user concerning. In these scenarios, due to the different requirements of users, there is need to rank the object set from different aspects and to re-rank the object set by integrating these different results to acquire a synthesize rank result.In this paper, we proposed a novel Feedback Ranking method, which lets two basic rankers learn from each other during the mutual process by providing each one's result as feedback to the other so as to boost the ranking performance. During the mutual ranking refinement process, we utilize iSRCC---an improvement on Spearman Rank Correlation to calculate the weight of each basic rankers dynamically. We apply this method into the article ranking problem on topic-query retrieval and evaluate its effectiveness on the TAC09 data set. Overall evaluation results are promising.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

269-274

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Furu Wei, Wenjie Li and Yanxiang He, "Co-Feedback Ranking for Query-Focused Summarization", Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pages 117–120al, 2011.

DOI: 10.3115/1667583.1667620

Google Scholar

[2] Furu Wei , Wenjie Li , Wei Wang and Yanxiang He, ''iRANK: An Interactive Ranking Framework and It Application in Query-Focused Summarization", CIKM'09, November 2–6,2009, Hong Kong, China .

DOI: 10.1145/1645953.1646171

Google Scholar

[3] Paul Over, Hoa Dang and Donna Harman. "2007 DUC in Context", Information Processing and Management, 43(6):1506-1520.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.01.019

Google Scholar

[4] A. Blum and T. Mitchell., "Combining Labeled and Unlabeled Data with Co-Training.", CoLT, pp.92-100.We,1998.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Pickens and G. Colovchinsky, "Ranked Feature Fusion Models for Ad Hoc Retrieval", CIKM, pp.893-900, 2008.

Google Scholar

[6] MEI paper on Spearmans rank correlation coefficient, (2007)

Google Scholar

[7] HANDBOOK OF BIOLOGICAL STATISTICS ,http://udel.edu/~mcdonald/statspearman.html

Google Scholar

[8] TAC2009 Update Summarization Task, http://www.nist.gov/tac/2009/Summarization

Google Scholar

[9] Michael Collins and Yoram Singer, "Unsupervised models for named entity classification", In Proceedings of the 1999 SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large,(1999)

Google Scholar

[10] Deerwester, S., et al,'' Improving Information Retrieval with Latent Semantic Indexing'', Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 25, 1988, p.36–40.

Google Scholar

[11] Akiko, Aizawa, "An information theoretic perspective of tf-idf measures", Information Processing & Management , January 2003,Pages45-65

DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4573(02)00021-3

Google Scholar