AR Based on ORB Feature and KLT Tracking

Article Preview

Abstract:

Currently Augmented Reality (AR) simply based on natural features is not efficient. In this paper, we propose a novel simple method of AR registration using Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF (ORB) features and Kanade-Lucas-Tracker (KLT) tracking algorithm. First we extract ORB natural features from a reference image and the first video frame. Select the matching points using appropriate Hamming distance and Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) algorithm. Then we track the matched ORB features of the next video frames with an updating KLT strategy. Finally we calculate and determine the camera pose using the matched feature point sets. Our experiments show that, in the cases of different scales, different angles, some changes in ambient light, complex backgrounds or part of the reference image blocked, our AR system performs well to track and position accurately. And the processing speed of our system approximately meets the requirement of real-time system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

333-340

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.T. Azuma et al. A survey of augmented reality. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4):355–385, 1997.

DOI: 10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

Google Scholar

[2] H. Bay, T. Tuytelaars, and L.V. Gool. SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features. In ISMAR '08 Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pages 125–134, 2008.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Bradski and A. Kaehler. Learning OpenCV: Computer vision with the OpenCV library. O'Reilly Media, 2008.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Calonder, V. Lepetit, C. Strecha, and P. Fua. BRIEF: Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features . In ECCV, volume 6314, pages 778–792, 2010.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15561-1_56

Google Scholar

[5] T. Fei, L. Xiao-hui, H. Zhi-ying, and H. Guo-liang. A Registration Method Based on Nature Feature with KLT Tracking Algorithm for Wearable Computers. In Cyberworlds, 2008 International Conference, pages 416 – 421, 2008.

DOI: 10.1109/cw.2008.29

Google Scholar

[6] M. Fiala. Artag, an improved marker system based on artoolkit. 2010.

Google Scholar

[7] F. Huang, Y. Zhou, Y. Yu, W. Zi-qiang, and D. Si-dan. PianoAR: A Markerless Augmented Reality Based Piano Teaching System . In Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC), volume 60, pages 91–110, 2011.

DOI: 10.1109/ihmsc.2011.82

Google Scholar

[8] H. Kato and M. Billinghurst. Marker tracking and hmd calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. In iwar, page 85. Published by the IEEE Computer Society, 1999.

DOI: 10.1109/iwar.1999.803809

Google Scholar

[9] D.G. Lowe. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints . In International Journal of Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 47–52, 2004.

DOI: 10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94

Google Scholar

[10] B.D. Lucas and T. Kanade. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 674 – 679, 1981.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Pang, M. Yuan, A. Nee, S. Ong, and K. Youcef-Toumi. A markerless registration method for augmented reality based on affine properties. In AUIC '06 Proceedings of the 7th Australasian User interface conference, pages 25 – 32, 2006.

Google Scholar

[12] E. Rublee, V. Rabaud, K. Konolige, and G. Bradski. ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF . In ICCV, pages 2564 – 2571, 2011.

DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2011.6126544

Google Scholar

[13] J. Shi and C. Tomasi. Good Features to Track. In CVPR, pages 593 – 600, 1994.

Google Scholar

[14] C. Tomasi and T. Kanade. Detection and Tracking of Point Features. In Carnegie Mellon University Technical Report CMU-CS-91-132, 1991.

Google Scholar

[15] D. Wagner, G. Reitmayr, A. Mulloni, T. Drummond, and D. Schmalstieg. Pose Tracking from Natural Features on Mobile Phones. In ICCV, pages 2564 – 2571, 2011.

DOI: 10.1109/ismar.2008.4637338

Google Scholar