Numerical Study on Precast RC Wall Panels with Angle Steel Boundary Components

Xiu Feng Xu; Tao Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.351-352.578

Paper Titles

The Experimental Study on Mechanical Performance of Multi-Span Column-Supported Assembly Box Concrete Hollow Floor
p.560

The Calculation of the Two-Layer Beam Model on an Elastic Basis with Variable Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
p.566

Comparison of Multiple Freeze-Thaw Cycles of High-Performance Concrete Test Beams and Concrete Beams Loaded Test
p.570

Study for Dynamic Stability Behavior of I-Section Cantilever Beam under Axis Compressive Load
p.574

Numerical Study on Precast RC Wall Panels with Angle Steel Boundary Components
p.578

Individual Anchored Strength Experimental Research for Prestressed End with Local Area Pressure
p.583

Debonding Behaviors of CFRP Strengthened RC Beams with Weak Interfaces
p.587

Experimental Study on Flexural Behavior of Different Damages Prestressed Concrete Hollow Slabs Strengthened with CFRP
p.592

Study on Seismic Behavior of Large Bay Brick Masonry Structures with Fewer Internal Longitudinal Walls
p.596

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 351-352Numerical Study on Precast RC Wall Panels with...

Numerical Study on Precast RC Wall Panels with Angle Steel Boundary Components

Abstract:

To evaluate the seismic behavior of precast reinforced concrete (RC) shear wall with steel boundary components, two pieces of prefabricated RC wall panels are tested quasi-statically under different axial compression forces. Both panels performed larger ductility than requested by the current seismic design code. Finite element model is then constructed to investigate the function of steel boundary components. The model is first calibrated by the experimental results. The strength, stiffness, and crack development all agree well with the phenomenon observed from experiments. Then the area of steel angle is changed as the main parameter to affect the seismic performance of RC wall panels. It is observed that the strength and ductility of a panel with steel boundary components are larger than that with common rebar boundary elements.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 351-352)

Pages:

578-582

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.351-352.578

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Xiu Feng Xu*, Tao Wang

Keywords:

Finite Element (FE) Simulation, Hysteresis Curve, Precast Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall, Quasi-Static Test, Steel Boundary Component

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Paolo Negro and Giandomenico Toniolo：Design Guidelines for Connections of Precast Structures under Seismic Actions. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] Priestly, MJN: Summary of test results from the PRESSS 5 story precast concrete building. SESOC report, 2000, 13(1): 21-37.

Google Scholar

[3] ZHU Zhangfeng GUO Zhengxing: Seismic test and analysis of joints of new precast concrete shear wall structures. China Civil Engineeirng Journal，2012, 45(1): 69-76. (in Chinese).

DOI: 10.1109/icetce.2011.5776414

Google Scholar

[4] LIU Jixin, LI Wenfeng, WANG Xiaoting, et al: Seismic behavior of a new assembled monolithic concrete wall structure. Journal of earthquake engineering and engineering vibration, 2012, 32(6): 111-118. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar