A Study on the Differences of Mechanical Properties between CH4 and CO2 Hydrate-Bearing Sediments

Article Preview

Abstract:

The CH4-CO2 replacement method to recover CH4 from hydrate-bearing sediments has received great attention because it enables the long term storage of CO2 and is expected to maintain the stability of gas hydrate-bearing sediments. This paper extends our previous study of the stability of CH4 hydrate-bearing sediments to CO2 hydrate-bearing sediments to evaluate the safety of the CH4-CO2 replacement method. Low temperature, high pressure triaxial compression apparatus was used to measure the mechanical properties of CO2 hydrate-bearing sediments. The triaxial tests results for CH4 and CO2 hydrate-bearing sediments were then compared. It was found that the failure mode of both the CO2 and CH4 hydrate-bearing sediments was a bulging deformation at mid-height on the samples. Moreover, the stress-strain curves of both the CO2 and CH4 hydrate-bearing sediments appear to be hyperbolic in shape, and could be divided into three stages: the quasi-elastic stage, the hardening stage and the yield stage. However, the strength of the CO2 hydrate-bearing sediments was approximately 15% larger than that of the CH4 hydrate-bearing sediments under the same conditions. The results imply that the stability of gas hydrate-bearing sediments could be maintained using the CH4-CO2 replacement method to recover CH4 from these sediments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1240-1244

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.F. Makogona, S.A. Holditcha, T.Y. Makogonb, Natural gas-hydrates — A potential energy source for the 21st Century, J Petrol Sci Eng, 56(2007) 14-31.

Google Scholar

[2] H.E. Brown, W.S. Holbrook, M.J. Hornbach, J. Nealon, Slide structure and role of gas hydrate at the northern boundary of the Storegga Slide, offshore Norway, Mar Geol, 229(2006) 179-86.

DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2006.03.011

Google Scholar

[3] J.W. Jung, D.N. Espinoza, J.C. Santamarina, Properties and phenomena relevant to CH4-CO2 replacement in hydrate-bearing sediments, J. Geophys. Res., 115(2010) B10102.

DOI: 10.1029/2009jb000812

Google Scholar

[4] M. Ota, K. Morohashi, Y. Abe, M. Watanabe, J.R.L. Smith, H. Inomata, Replacement of CH4 in the hydrate by use of liquid CO2, Energ Convers Manage, 46(2005) 1680-91.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2004.10.002

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Li, Y. Song, F. Yu, W. Liu, J. Zhao, Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sediments Using Kaolin Clay, China Ocean Engineering, 25(2011) 113-22.

DOI: 10.1007/s13344-011-0009-6

Google Scholar

[6] E.D. Sloan, C.A. Koh, Clathrate Hydrates of natural gases, third ed., CRC Press, New York,USA, (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] K. Terzaghi, R.B. Peck, Soil mechanics in engineering practice, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1967).

Google Scholar