Small Spacing Tunnels the Blasting Excavation Dynamic Effect

Abstract:

Kinetic research of Small spacing tunnel blasting excavation is always the hot issue both at home and abroad. In this paper, the entrance section of a small spacing tunnel is chose as an example, the Explicit dynamic finite element model and the Euler method is adopted to accurately simulate the process of blasting vibration, and the peak vibration velocity response of the tunnel is gotten. Studies has shown that, the peak velocity is more sensitive to space change when clear distance is less than 1.5 times of the hole diameter; various depth of tunnel causes different clamping action of surrounding rock, thus has different effects on peak velocity; vibration velocity at head-burst side is 5-8 times more than that at back side, vibration velocity at tunnel waist is 1.98-2.23 times more than that at up side, vibration velocity at tunnel shoulder is 1.68-1.85 times more than that at up side, so the waist position at head-burst side should be given exclusive attention.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 353-356)
• Pages: 1484-1489
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.353-356.1484
• Online since: August 2013
• Authors: You Mo, Bin Teng, Zu Yin Zou, Lin Li, Mei Zhong
• Keywords: Blasting Excavation, Explicit Dynamic Finite Element Model, Small Spacing Tunnel

References

[1] YaoYong, He Chuan, Zhou Lil, iet a1. Effect analysis and controlled measures research about blasting vibration to neighboring tunnel [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2007, 8(6): 702-708( in Chinese).

[2] LIN Gongmou, CHEN Libao, JIANG Lili, ZHENG Hongli. Research on blasting stability control technology of large-span highway tunnel with super-small clear sapcing at highway expansion project[J]. Chinese Jorunal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. 2010, 29(7): 1371-1378(in chinese).

[3] Yan Xiaobo, Zheng Bin, Deng Tao, Wu Xiangdong, Zang Yanwei. Effect of secondary thichness on blasting velocity and impact Stress. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering[J]. 2012, supp1（8）(in chinese).

[4] J.C. Li,H.B. Li,G.W. Ma,Y.X. Zhou. Assessment of underground tunnel stability to adjacent tunnel explosion[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2012.07.005

[5] M. Ramulu A.K. Chakraborty T.G. Sitharam. Damage assement of basaltic rock mass due to repeated blasting in a railway tunneling project-A case study[J], 2009(24): 208-221.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2008.08.002

[6] Cu i Jihong, Zhou Jian, Lin Congmou. Numerical simulation of effect ofblasting seismic on existing chamber [J]. Noferrous Metals, 2008, 60( 1) : 1012104( in Chinese ).

[7] Gong Jianwu, Xia Caichu, Zheng Zhidong, et a. l Measurement and analysis of blasting vibration in Heshang three lane tunnels with small clear space [ J] . Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26( 9): 1882-1887 ( in Chinese).

[8] YI Chang-ping, LU Wen-bo. A study of the effect of blasting vibration on adjacent tunnel. Engineering Blasting, 2004, 10(1): 1-5. (in chinese).

[9] Fu H ongxian . Blasting design and construction of long distance with little space tunnel [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2006, 12 ( 3): 30-32 ( inChinese).